Thursday, 31 January 2008
Ron Paul Answers: Should we be in Iraq for 100 years? : Watch the smirks on the faces of the other candidates
Health: Open Letter to Chariman John Murta, Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense regarding AIDS from Dr. Boyd Graves
January 30, 2008
Chairman John Murtha
Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense
Washington, D.C.
Re: U.S. Defense Appropriations to develop HIV/AIDS
Dear Chairman Murtha:
I write today on behalf of the American people and the people of the world who seek a peaceful solution to the resolution of the AIDS weapon. We know the HIV/AIDS virus is a weapon because we can ALL read U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129, “Synthetic Biological Agent”.
For your convenience, I have included page 129 with this fax. For the record, on February 18, 1999, Pentagon Director A.H. Passarella confirmed AIDS is a synthetic biological agent. I would be happy to provide you a copy of his letter.
History reveals that only once in history in the animal population has a disease led to “animal wasting” in epidemic numbers. That disease is “visna” which began wasting the sheep of Iceland in 1932, the same year as we began Tuskegee syphilis experiments on Black Americans.
After importing the nazi scientists in “Project Paperclip” (beginning in 1945), it appears the United States had a crude form of HIV/AIDS as early as the May 1946 Appropriations. See, “Better” Than the Bomb, TIME, June 3, 1946.
These Appropriations are part of the concrete evidence the American people and the people of the world have compiled with respect to our resolve to know the truth. In this regard and in support of the foregoing, we have an additional question for the U.S. Congress: “If there was a federal virus development program that preceded HIV/AIDS, should that program be reviewed”?
If your answer is “YES, Mr. Chairman; should Congress then account for the 550 million dollars they have secretly spent to fund the U.S. Special (Cancer) Virus program?
Any cursory review of this federal program will prove the United States sought a “candidate virus” that would waste the immune system of primarily people of color in accordance with NSSM-200 and U.S. Public Law 91-213.
In President Nixon’s July 18, 1969 Special Memo to Congress (on overpopulation), the message is clear, there will be ‘explosive events’ in the last third of the 20th Century.
Mr. Chairman, not only is page 129 compelling evidence of the true laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS, but equally true is page 121. Here, Dr. Mac Arthur testifies the ‘agent’ they were working on would create a “world wide scourge” and “black death type plague” in certain geographical areas and regions of the world.
Mr. Chairman, the U.S. Special Virus program began officially in 1962 and ended in 1978. The program produced fifteen progress reports and is coordinated by a 1971 flowchart blueprint. See, www.boydgraves.com/flowchart. To date sir, over four million people have the “research logic” flowchart of the U.S. Special Virus program. We believe this Congressional Committee has the jurisdiction and the authority to address the concerns of so many Americans and others.
Sincerely,
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
cc: Don Payne, Chairman
Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health
Chairman John Murtha
Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense
Washington, D.C.
Re: U.S. Defense Appropriations to develop HIV/AIDS
Dear Chairman Murtha:
I write today on behalf of the American people and the people of the world who seek a peaceful solution to the resolution of the AIDS weapon. We know the HIV/AIDS virus is a weapon because we can ALL read U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129, “Synthetic Biological Agent”.
For your convenience, I have included page 129 with this fax. For the record, on February 18, 1999, Pentagon Director A.H. Passarella confirmed AIDS is a synthetic biological agent. I would be happy to provide you a copy of his letter.
History reveals that only once in history in the animal population has a disease led to “animal wasting” in epidemic numbers. That disease is “visna” which began wasting the sheep of Iceland in 1932, the same year as we began Tuskegee syphilis experiments on Black Americans.
After importing the nazi scientists in “Project Paperclip” (beginning in 1945), it appears the United States had a crude form of HIV/AIDS as early as the May 1946 Appropriations. See, “Better” Than the Bomb, TIME, June 3, 1946.
These Appropriations are part of the concrete evidence the American people and the people of the world have compiled with respect to our resolve to know the truth. In this regard and in support of the foregoing, we have an additional question for the U.S. Congress: “If there was a federal virus development program that preceded HIV/AIDS, should that program be reviewed”?
If your answer is “YES, Mr. Chairman; should Congress then account for the 550 million dollars they have secretly spent to fund the U.S. Special (Cancer) Virus program?
Any cursory review of this federal program will prove the United States sought a “candidate virus” that would waste the immune system of primarily people of color in accordance with NSSM-200 and U.S. Public Law 91-213.
In President Nixon’s July 18, 1969 Special Memo to Congress (on overpopulation), the message is clear, there will be ‘explosive events’ in the last third of the 20th Century.
Mr. Chairman, not only is page 129 compelling evidence of the true laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS, but equally true is page 121. Here, Dr. Mac Arthur testifies the ‘agent’ they were working on would create a “world wide scourge” and “black death type plague” in certain geographical areas and regions of the world.
Mr. Chairman, the U.S. Special Virus program began officially in 1962 and ended in 1978. The program produced fifteen progress reports and is coordinated by a 1971 flowchart blueprint. See, www.boydgraves.com/flowchart. To date sir, over four million people have the “research logic” flowchart of the U.S. Special Virus program. We believe this Congressional Committee has the jurisdiction and the authority to address the concerns of so many Americans and others.
Sincerely,
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
cc: Don Payne, Chairman
Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health
Tuesday, 29 January 2008
The History of the Pharma-Cartel - aka why we are less healthy than our grandparents.
1911, May 15
The Supreme Court of the U.S. finds John Rockefeller and his Trust guilty of corruption, illegal business practices and racketeering. As a result of this decision, the entire Rockefeller Standard Oil-Trust, the world's largest corporation of its time, was sentenced to be dismantled. But Rockefeller was already above the Supreme Court and did not care about this decision.
1913
In order to disperse public and political pressure on him and other robber-barons, Rockefeller uses a trick called "philanthropy", whereby the illegal gains from his robber-practices in the oil business are used to launch the Rockefeller Foundation. This tax haven was used to strategically take over the health care sector in the U.S..
The Rockefeller Foundation was the front organization for a new global business venture of Rockefeller and his accomplices. This new venture was called the pharmaceutical investment business. Donations from the Rockefeller Foundation went only to medical schools and hospitals. These institutions had become missionaries of a new breed of companies: the manufacturers of patented, synthetic drugs.
This was also the time when the first vitamins were discovered. It soon became clear however that these natural molecules had live-saving health benefits and that they were able to prevent many chronic health conditions. The first books appeared with research, subsequently abandoned, about the health benefits of vitamins. These newly discovered molecules had only one disadvantage: they were non-patentable.
Thus, in its first years of existence, the pharmaceutical investment business already faced a mortal thread: vitamins and other micronutrients promoted as public health programs would prohibit the development of any sizable investment business based on patented drugs. The elimination of this unwanted competition from natural micronutrients therefore became a question of life and death for the pharmaceutical business.
1918
The Rockefeller Foundation uses the Spanish flu epidemic – and the media (that it already controlled by this time) – to start a witch-hunt on all forms of medicine that were not covered by its patents.
Within the next 15 years, all medical schools in the U.S., most hospitals and the American Medical Association all essentially became pawns on the chessboard of Rockefeller's strategy to subjugate the entire health care sector under the monopoly of his pharmaceutical investment business.
Disguised as a "Mother Theresa", the Rockefeller Foundation was also used to conquer foreign countries and entire continents for the pharmaceutical investment business – just as Rockefeller himself had done a few decades previously with his petrochemical investment business.
1925
On the other side of the Atlantic, in Germany, the first chemical / pharmaceutical cartel is founded in order to compete with Rockefeller's quest for control of the global drug market. Lead by the German multinationals Bayer, BASF and Hoechst, the I.G. Farben cartel was founded with a total number of employees surpassing 80,000. The race for global control was on.
1929, November 29
The Rockefeller cartel (U.S.A.) and the I.G. Farben cartel (Germany) decided to divide the entire globe into interest spheres – the very same crime Rockefeller had been sentenced for 18 years earlier, when his trust had divided up the U.S. into "interest zones".
1932 / 33
The I.G. Farben cartel, equally insatiable, decides no longer to be bound by the 1929 constraints. They support an uprising German politician, who promises I.G. Farben to militarily conquer the world for them. With millions of dollars in election campaign donations, this politician seized power in Germany, turned the German democracy into a dictatorship and kept his promise to launch his conquest war, a war that soon became known as WWII.
In each and every country Hitler's wehrmacht invaded, the first act was to rob the chemical, petrochemical and pharmaceutical industries and assign them – free of charge – to the I.G. Farben empire.
1942 - 45
In order to cement its global leadership with patented drugs, the I.G. Farben cartel tests its patented pharmaceutical substances on concentration camp inmates in Auschwitz, Dachau and many other sites. The fees for conducting these inhumane studies were transferred directly from the bank accounts of Bayer, Hoechst and BASF to the bank accounts of the SS, who operated the concentration camps.
1945
I.G. Farben's plan to take control of the global oil and drug markets has failed. The U.S. and the other allied forces won WWII. Nevertheless, many U.S. and allied soldiers had lost their lives during the conflict, and the allies' reward was little compared to the rewards of others. The corporate shares of the losers, I.G. Farben, went to the Rockefeller trust (U.S.A.) and Rothschild / J.P. Morgan (U.K.).
1947
In the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal, 24 managers from Bayer, BASF, Hoechst and other executives of the I.G. Farben cartel were tried for crimes against humanity. These crimes included: leading wars of aggression, instituting slavery and committing mass murder. In his final pleading, U.S.-Chief Prosecutor Telford Taylor summarized the crimes committed by these corporate criminals with the following words: "Without I.G. Farben, the second World War would not have been possible".
Amazingly, the real culprits for the death of 60 Million people in World War II – the I.G. Farben executives – received the mildest verdicts. Even those executives directly responsible for the crimes in I.G. Auschwitz only received a maximum of twelve years in jail. Surprised? You shouldn't be.
By 1944 Nelson Rockefeller had already entered the executive branch of the U.S. government. He started off as Under-Secretary of State and ended up a few years later as Special Adviser of President Truman for Special Affairs. In other words, at critical junctures of the 20th century, the Rockefeller interests took direct charge. They decided the post war shape of the world and the distribution of its wealth.
As such, under the influence of the U.S. State Department, the verdicts in Nuremberg against the I.G. Farben managers can easily be explained. In return for taking over the corporate shares of I.G. Farben, and thereby global control of the oil and drug business, Nelson Rockefeller made sure that the real culprits of World War II were not hanged. In fact, and as we shall see, they were needed.
1949
The Federal Republic of Germany was founded. This was the first time in history that the constitution and society of an industrialized nation could be planned and modeled as a fortress of the pharmaceutical investment business – a transatlantic outpost of the Rockefeller interests.
Within only a few years, the I.G. Farben managers sentenced in Nuremberg were released from jail and put back into their previous positions as stakeholders of the Rockefeller interests. Fritz Ter Meer, for example, sentenced to twelve years in jail for his crimes in Auschwitz, was back as chairman of the board of Germany's largest pharmaceutical multinational, Bayer, by 1963!
1945 - 49
The role of the Rockefeller brothers was not limited to their taking over the global monopolies of the oil and drug businesses. They also needed to create the political framework for these businesses to thrive. Under their influence, therefore, the United Nations was founded in 1945, in San Francisco. To seize political control of the post war world, three countries – leading drug export nations – had all the say, and 200 other nations were rendered mere spectators.
Founded as organizations to allegedly serve the wellbeing of the people of the world, the UN's subsidiary organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Trade Organization (WTO), soon turned out to be nothing more than the political arms of the global oil and drug interests.
1963
On behalf of the Rockefeller interests, the government of the pharmaceutical banana republic Germany spearheaded one of the most infamous efforts ever made within the United Nations. Under the pretense of consumer protection, it launched a four-decade-long crusade to outlaw vitamin therapies and other natural, non-patentable health approaches in all member countries of the United Nations. The goal was to simply ban any and all competition for the multi-billion dollar business with patented drugs. The plan was simple: copy for the entire world what had already been accomplished in America in the 1920s – a monopoly on health care for the investment business with patented drugs.
Since the marketplace for the pharmaceutical investment business depends upon the continued existence of diseases, the drugs it developed were not intended to prevent, cure or eradicate disease. Thus, the goal of the global strategy was to monopolize health for billions of people, with pills that nearly cover symptoms but hardly ever address the root cause of disease. The deprivation of billions of people from having access to life saving information about the health benefits of natural health approaches, whilst at the same time establishing a monopoly with largely ineffective and frequently toxic patented drugs, caused disease and death in genocidal proportions.
This epidemic of unnecessary disability and death by the pharmaceutical business with disease is unparalleled in history.
Linus Pauling and other eminent scientists deserve credit for having kept open the door of knowledge about the health benefits of vitamins and other effective natural health approaches. If it were not for them we would already be living in a health prison today, guarded by the gatekeepers of the pharmaceutical business with disease in medicine, politics and the media.
Linus Pauling should also be credited for having identified the significance of Dr. Rath's early research in vitamins and cardiovascular disease, and for having invited Dr. Rath to join him during his last years to continue his life's work.
1990 - 92
These years will go down in history as the beginning of the end of the pharmaceutical business with disease. In a series of scientific publications, in some of which Dr. Rath invited Linus Pauling to join him as co-author, Dr. Rath identified micronutrient deficiency as the primary cause of diseases. These diseases include heart attacks, high blood pressure, diabetic circulatory problems, cancer and even immune deficiency diseases, including AIDS.
Like a Sherlock Holmes of science, Dr. Rath traced the real cause of these diseases, and found that they had been deliberately nebulized or even hidden away from millions of people for one purpose only: to feed the insatiable greed of the pharmaceutical business with disease.
The Supreme Court of the U.S. finds John Rockefeller and his Trust guilty of corruption, illegal business practices and racketeering. As a result of this decision, the entire Rockefeller Standard Oil-Trust, the world's largest corporation of its time, was sentenced to be dismantled. But Rockefeller was already above the Supreme Court and did not care about this decision.
1913
In order to disperse public and political pressure on him and other robber-barons, Rockefeller uses a trick called "philanthropy", whereby the illegal gains from his robber-practices in the oil business are used to launch the Rockefeller Foundation. This tax haven was used to strategically take over the health care sector in the U.S..
The Rockefeller Foundation was the front organization for a new global business venture of Rockefeller and his accomplices. This new venture was called the pharmaceutical investment business. Donations from the Rockefeller Foundation went only to medical schools and hospitals. These institutions had become missionaries of a new breed of companies: the manufacturers of patented, synthetic drugs.
This was also the time when the first vitamins were discovered. It soon became clear however that these natural molecules had live-saving health benefits and that they were able to prevent many chronic health conditions. The first books appeared with research, subsequently abandoned, about the health benefits of vitamins. These newly discovered molecules had only one disadvantage: they were non-patentable.
Thus, in its first years of existence, the pharmaceutical investment business already faced a mortal thread: vitamins and other micronutrients promoted as public health programs would prohibit the development of any sizable investment business based on patented drugs. The elimination of this unwanted competition from natural micronutrients therefore became a question of life and death for the pharmaceutical business.
1918
The Rockefeller Foundation uses the Spanish flu epidemic – and the media (that it already controlled by this time) – to start a witch-hunt on all forms of medicine that were not covered by its patents.
Within the next 15 years, all medical schools in the U.S., most hospitals and the American Medical Association all essentially became pawns on the chessboard of Rockefeller's strategy to subjugate the entire health care sector under the monopoly of his pharmaceutical investment business.
Disguised as a "Mother Theresa", the Rockefeller Foundation was also used to conquer foreign countries and entire continents for the pharmaceutical investment business – just as Rockefeller himself had done a few decades previously with his petrochemical investment business.
1925
On the other side of the Atlantic, in Germany, the first chemical / pharmaceutical cartel is founded in order to compete with Rockefeller's quest for control of the global drug market. Lead by the German multinationals Bayer, BASF and Hoechst, the I.G. Farben cartel was founded with a total number of employees surpassing 80,000. The race for global control was on.
1929, November 29
The Rockefeller cartel (U.S.A.) and the I.G. Farben cartel (Germany) decided to divide the entire globe into interest spheres – the very same crime Rockefeller had been sentenced for 18 years earlier, when his trust had divided up the U.S. into "interest zones".
1932 / 33
The I.G. Farben cartel, equally insatiable, decides no longer to be bound by the 1929 constraints. They support an uprising German politician, who promises I.G. Farben to militarily conquer the world for them. With millions of dollars in election campaign donations, this politician seized power in Germany, turned the German democracy into a dictatorship and kept his promise to launch his conquest war, a war that soon became known as WWII.
In each and every country Hitler's wehrmacht invaded, the first act was to rob the chemical, petrochemical and pharmaceutical industries and assign them – free of charge – to the I.G. Farben empire.
1942 - 45
In order to cement its global leadership with patented drugs, the I.G. Farben cartel tests its patented pharmaceutical substances on concentration camp inmates in Auschwitz, Dachau and many other sites. The fees for conducting these inhumane studies were transferred directly from the bank accounts of Bayer, Hoechst and BASF to the bank accounts of the SS, who operated the concentration camps.
1945
I.G. Farben's plan to take control of the global oil and drug markets has failed. The U.S. and the other allied forces won WWII. Nevertheless, many U.S. and allied soldiers had lost their lives during the conflict, and the allies' reward was little compared to the rewards of others. The corporate shares of the losers, I.G. Farben, went to the Rockefeller trust (U.S.A.) and Rothschild / J.P. Morgan (U.K.).
1947
In the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal, 24 managers from Bayer, BASF, Hoechst and other executives of the I.G. Farben cartel were tried for crimes against humanity. These crimes included: leading wars of aggression, instituting slavery and committing mass murder. In his final pleading, U.S.-Chief Prosecutor Telford Taylor summarized the crimes committed by these corporate criminals with the following words: "Without I.G. Farben, the second World War would not have been possible".
Amazingly, the real culprits for the death of 60 Million people in World War II – the I.G. Farben executives – received the mildest verdicts. Even those executives directly responsible for the crimes in I.G. Auschwitz only received a maximum of twelve years in jail. Surprised? You shouldn't be.
By 1944 Nelson Rockefeller had already entered the executive branch of the U.S. government. He started off as Under-Secretary of State and ended up a few years later as Special Adviser of President Truman for Special Affairs. In other words, at critical junctures of the 20th century, the Rockefeller interests took direct charge. They decided the post war shape of the world and the distribution of its wealth.
As such, under the influence of the U.S. State Department, the verdicts in Nuremberg against the I.G. Farben managers can easily be explained. In return for taking over the corporate shares of I.G. Farben, and thereby global control of the oil and drug business, Nelson Rockefeller made sure that the real culprits of World War II were not hanged. In fact, and as we shall see, they were needed.
1949
The Federal Republic of Germany was founded. This was the first time in history that the constitution and society of an industrialized nation could be planned and modeled as a fortress of the pharmaceutical investment business – a transatlantic outpost of the Rockefeller interests.
Within only a few years, the I.G. Farben managers sentenced in Nuremberg were released from jail and put back into their previous positions as stakeholders of the Rockefeller interests. Fritz Ter Meer, for example, sentenced to twelve years in jail for his crimes in Auschwitz, was back as chairman of the board of Germany's largest pharmaceutical multinational, Bayer, by 1963!
1945 - 49
The role of the Rockefeller brothers was not limited to their taking over the global monopolies of the oil and drug businesses. They also needed to create the political framework for these businesses to thrive. Under their influence, therefore, the United Nations was founded in 1945, in San Francisco. To seize political control of the post war world, three countries – leading drug export nations – had all the say, and 200 other nations were rendered mere spectators.
Founded as organizations to allegedly serve the wellbeing of the people of the world, the UN's subsidiary organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Trade Organization (WTO), soon turned out to be nothing more than the political arms of the global oil and drug interests.
1963
On behalf of the Rockefeller interests, the government of the pharmaceutical banana republic Germany spearheaded one of the most infamous efforts ever made within the United Nations. Under the pretense of consumer protection, it launched a four-decade-long crusade to outlaw vitamin therapies and other natural, non-patentable health approaches in all member countries of the United Nations. The goal was to simply ban any and all competition for the multi-billion dollar business with patented drugs. The plan was simple: copy for the entire world what had already been accomplished in America in the 1920s – a monopoly on health care for the investment business with patented drugs.
Since the marketplace for the pharmaceutical investment business depends upon the continued existence of diseases, the drugs it developed were not intended to prevent, cure or eradicate disease. Thus, the goal of the global strategy was to monopolize health for billions of people, with pills that nearly cover symptoms but hardly ever address the root cause of disease. The deprivation of billions of people from having access to life saving information about the health benefits of natural health approaches, whilst at the same time establishing a monopoly with largely ineffective and frequently toxic patented drugs, caused disease and death in genocidal proportions.
This epidemic of unnecessary disability and death by the pharmaceutical business with disease is unparalleled in history.
Linus Pauling and other eminent scientists deserve credit for having kept open the door of knowledge about the health benefits of vitamins and other effective natural health approaches. If it were not for them we would already be living in a health prison today, guarded by the gatekeepers of the pharmaceutical business with disease in medicine, politics and the media.
Linus Pauling should also be credited for having identified the significance of Dr. Rath's early research in vitamins and cardiovascular disease, and for having invited Dr. Rath to join him during his last years to continue his life's work.
1990 - 92
These years will go down in history as the beginning of the end of the pharmaceutical business with disease. In a series of scientific publications, in some of which Dr. Rath invited Linus Pauling to join him as co-author, Dr. Rath identified micronutrient deficiency as the primary cause of diseases. These diseases include heart attacks, high blood pressure, diabetic circulatory problems, cancer and even immune deficiency diseases, including AIDS.
Like a Sherlock Holmes of science, Dr. Rath traced the real cause of these diseases, and found that they had been deliberately nebulized or even hidden away from millions of people for one purpose only: to feed the insatiable greed of the pharmaceutical business with disease.
Sunday, 27 January 2008
Why the CIA is the World's Number One Terrorist Organization - Working for big business not the taxpayer
The CIA. itself a ruthless, terrorist organization inspires terrorism in response. In some cases, notably the CIA and al Qaeda, the relationship between the CIA and terrorism is symbiotic. The CIA has perpetrated an "American Holocaust", the deaths of some 6 million people from its inception to the year 1987. As Long as the CIA Exists, the US will never be safe from terrorism.
Since 9/11, the Bush administration has been propping up Musharraf's military regime with $3.6 billion in economic aid from the US and a US-sponsored consortium, not to mention $900 million in military aid and the postponement of overdue debt repayments totaling $13.5 billion. But now the administration is debating whether Musharraf has become too dependent on Islamic extremist political parties in Pakistan to further US interests, and whether he should be pressured to permit the return of two exiled former prime ministers, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, who have formed an electoral alliance to challenge him in presidential elections scheduled for next year.
Full Article: http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-cia-is-worlds-number-one-terrorist.html
Since 9/11, the Bush administration has been propping up Musharraf's military regime with $3.6 billion in economic aid from the US and a US-sponsored consortium, not to mention $900 million in military aid and the postponement of overdue debt repayments totaling $13.5 billion. But now the administration is debating whether Musharraf has become too dependent on Islamic extremist political parties in Pakistan to further US interests, and whether he should be pressured to permit the return of two exiled former prime ministers, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, who have formed an electoral alliance to challenge him in presidential elections scheduled for next year.
Full Article: http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-cia-is-worlds-number-one-terrorist.html
Saturday, 26 January 2008
Sibel Edmonds, A brave women exposes spies in the US Government and Losses her Job. - Gagged in the name of National Security
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2008/01/video-sibel-edmonds-movie-kill.html
Everyone should watch this film. This film is in six parts so you need to back up after each segment and select the next segment.
Everyone should watch this film. This film is in six parts so you need to back up after each segment and select the next segment.
People should not be distinguished in order to divide: A Wake up call to the new world order
By Marcus Salek, Prague
10 years ago, Revd Father Hilary Greenwood of St. Clement Anglican Church in Prague stood up and gave a very short sermon. He said "People should not be distinguished in order to divide" and sat down. All of us at the service sat silent for about 5 minutes and after his words sank in, many of us were very moved by what he meant.
What he meant was we should not show distinction between people of different religions, race, creeds, social status, wealth, nationality, sexual orientation, politics, in order to divide and create a "us verses them" environment. We should treat all human beings as our brothers and sisters.
Father Hilary passed away a few years ago, but he must of known something the rest of us did not. And unfortunately, only a few of us were listening, including the American and British Ambassadors who were present at the service.
When you watch this video about our future as citizens of this planet, think about how out of touch we have been with the reality of what is going on in your life. In our quest for easy credit, entertainment, and the good life, we haven't noticed that evil men have taken over our government, and most governments of the world. Our life is about to change, very dramatically, and very soon. We are about to live under a world-wide government much like 'George Orwell described in his book, 1984. Only worse.
-
Unfortunately, most of us didn't Cherish freedom enough. We were all chasing the "holy grail of consumerism". We were warned over and over again over the last 100 years, but most people did not listen. As children of the media, our minds were reprogrammed to accept what is about to happen in our lives and our future as normal. We are being reprogrammed now to accept "One World Government" . One world thinking, one world money, one world medicine designed to shorten your life, one world everything.
-
The world as we know it may be over, and its our fault. We were asleep. We trusted the wrong people. We watched television instead of talking to our friends and making relationships. Worse, we believed the propaganda from the news reports, religious leaders, the socialcrats, the history teachers, the war mongers, our Presidents, our elected Representatives, the bankers, and most people in power. The truth is, the only leaders who we could believe in were assassinated. Anyone who has not been assassinated is part of the New World order, and the ones that were assassinated can't help us. I guess we got the government we deserve. We allowed them to divide us and turn brothers and sisters into "them and they" instead of fellow human beings.
10 years ago, Revd Father Hilary Greenwood of St. Clement Anglican Church in Prague stood up and gave a very short sermon. He said "People should not be distinguished in order to divide" and sat down. All of us at the service sat silent for about 5 minutes and after his words sank in, many of us were very moved by what he meant.What he meant was we should not show distinction between people of different religions, race, creeds, social status, wealth, nationality, sexual orientation, politics, in order to divide and create a "us verses them" environment. We should treat all human beings as our brothers and sisters.
Father Hilary passed away a few years ago, but he must of known something the rest of us did not. And unfortunately, only a few of us were listening, including the American and British Ambassadors who were present at the service.
When you watch this video about our future as citizens of this planet, think about how out of touch we have been with the reality of what is going on in your life. In our quest for easy credit, entertainment, and the good life, we haven't noticed that evil men have taken over our government, and most governments of the world. Our life is about to change, very dramatically, and very soon. We are about to live under a world-wide government much like 'George Orwell described in his book, 1984. Only worse.
-
Unfortunately, most of us didn't Cherish freedom enough. We were all chasing the "holy grail of consumerism". We were warned over and over again over the last 100 years, but most people did not listen. As children of the media, our minds were reprogrammed to accept what is about to happen in our lives and our future as normal. We are being reprogrammed now to accept "One World Government" . One world thinking, one world money, one world medicine designed to shorten your life, one world everything.
-
The world as we know it may be over, and its our fault. We were asleep. We trusted the wrong people. We watched television instead of talking to our friends and making relationships. Worse, we believed the propaganda from the news reports, religious leaders, the socialcrats, the history teachers, the war mongers, our Presidents, our elected Representatives, the bankers, and most people in power. The truth is, the only leaders who we could believe in were assassinated. Anyone who has not been assassinated is part of the New World order, and the ones that were assassinated can't help us. I guess we got the government we deserve. We allowed them to divide us and turn brothers and sisters into "them and they" instead of fellow human beings.
-
Now what are we going to do about it?
[Scenes from the movie Zeitgeist Video Clip: 9 Minutes]
Friday, 25 January 2008
How They Control the World
By Henry Makow PhD
1-24-8
To understand current events, we need a new paradigm.
The paradigm fostered by the mass media of a 'balanced' world consisting of competing interests, nations, ideologies and religions only gives us false confidence and traps us in a false matrix of "good guys vs. bad guys."
As my readers know, I suspect that most "competing" groups/ ideologies actually have been created or subverted by a single force: a satanic cult, the Illuminati (Sabbatean-Frankist Jews and cabalistic Freemasons.) This clique is empowered by a cartel of cartels, beginning with world central banking, based in London. It uses MI-6, the CIA, the Mossad and other "Intelligence" agencies as instruments and controls the media and most politicians.
The Sabbatean-Frankists were a Jewish heresy that captured half the Jewish world in the 17th and 18th Century. They eschewed all morality preaching that good is evil and vice- versa. They believe that chaos and devastation will hasten the return of their Messiah. They went underground and prospered by intermarrying with non-Jews and assuming conventional Jewish or non-Jewish identities. The "Catholic" half-Jewish John Kerry or Madelaine Albright are examples.
http://www.henrymakow.com/the_satanic_cult_that_rules_th.html
1-24-8
To understand current events, we need a new paradigm.
The paradigm fostered by the mass media of a 'balanced' world consisting of competing interests, nations, ideologies and religions only gives us false confidence and traps us in a false matrix of "good guys vs. bad guys."
As my readers know, I suspect that most "competing" groups/ ideologies actually have been created or subverted by a single force: a satanic cult, the Illuminati (Sabbatean-Frankist Jews and cabalistic Freemasons.) This clique is empowered by a cartel of cartels, beginning with world central banking, based in London. It uses MI-6, the CIA, the Mossad and other "Intelligence" agencies as instruments and controls the media and most politicians.
The Sabbatean-Frankists were a Jewish heresy that captured half the Jewish world in the 17th and 18th Century. They eschewed all morality preaching that good is evil and vice- versa. They believe that chaos and devastation will hasten the return of their Messiah. They went underground and prospered by intermarrying with non-Jews and assuming conventional Jewish or non-Jewish identities. The "Catholic" half-Jewish John Kerry or Madelaine Albright are examples.
http://www.henrymakow.com/the_satanic_cult_that_rules_th.html
My working hypothesis is that most wars/conflicts are orchestrated by this satanic cult. The same people secretly manipulate events on both sides to undermine "all collective forces except our own" ("The Protocols of Zion") and establish world government tyranny (a.k.a. "globalization.") In other words, an Occult Elite is waging war on humanity and we don't even know it.
In the Protocols, the author, who I suspect was the Sabbatean Lionel Rothschild, writes that their goal is: "To wear everyone out by dissension, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculation of diseases, want, until the Gentiles sees no other way of escape except by appeal to our money and our power." (Protocol 10) [And] "... enable us to absorb without disturbance all the governmental forces of the world and thus form a super-government." (Protocol 5)
"Who will ever suspect then that ALL THESE PEOPLES WERE STAGE- MANAGED BY US ACCORDING TO A POLITICAL PLAN WHICH NO ONE HAS SO MUCH AS GUESSED AT IN THE COURSE OF MANY CENTURIES?" (Protocol 13, emphasis mine)
Creating conflict makes fiendish sense. If they were to declare their true intention, they would meet opposition from all sides. Instead they create and hide behind opposing forces and manipulate the outcome ensuring that "true believers" (the capable & uncorrupted) die in the process. Everyone is so busy fighting, they can't see the real foe and the real agenda.
I'll start by mentioning some random conflicts that fit this paradigm. (Research them and see if I am right.) Then I'll cite some more references to show that this strategy is deliberate.
CONFLICTS
I suspect the Labor, Women's and US Gay and Negro Civil Rights Movement all fit this pattern. They were all sponsored by the bankers,and run by Masonic and Communist Jews or their dupes. While they addressed legitimate injustices, their real purpose was to sow division.
Harold Rosenthal is credible when he says: "Through our national bank, the Federal Reserve, we extend book credit which we create from nothing to all local banks ... [Thus] we bring industry, management and labor into our debt...and pit management against labor so they will never unite and attack us and usher in a debt-free industrial utopia."
http://www.savethemales.ca/000154.html
Through control of the mass media, Rosenthal says we "have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns. With their eyes fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene. "
Alan Stang deals with the true origins of Civil Rights in his book "It's Very Simple." I touch on it in my article "Red Rosa Parks: Fabricating an American Icon."
http://www.savethemales.ca/001228.html
Kevin MacDonald does a masterful analysis of how the bankers used Masonic Jews to take over the Conservative end of the political spectrum. "Is Neo Conservatism a Jewish Movement?"
http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/archives/vol4no2/km-understandIII.html
Global Warming is yet another created conflict. The Club of Rome talked about using it as a fabricated "enemy" 17 years ago. (See "The Vacuum" in "The First Global Revolution" 1991 by Alexander King.) On one side you have Al Gore, Illuminati in good standing. On the other side, you have films made by debunkers that are featured on the BBC, an Illuminati mouthpiece. Obviously this debate is certified "Masonic Kosher."
Remember how Stalin exterminated much of the Soviet officer core in the late 1930's on "faked evidence" from Reinhard Heydrich? I suspect Stalin knew the evidence was fake and was doing away with nationalists and cult outsiders. Similarly Stalin exterminated the cream of the Polish officer core at Katyn forest.I suspect Illuminati Nazis collaborated with Illuminati Communists.
I ave no evidence but I wouldn't be surprised if the Taliban was supported by the bankers through the Pakistani ISI, and the Iraqi insurgency through Saudi Arabia. The Sunnis are now on the US payroll. How does that work?
Vladimir Putin has a lot of fans. I'd love if he were for real. Unfortunately, I suspect he's been dealt the good guy role in a potential future world war. I suspect the US/British-Russian feud is for show only. The "tell" is the amount of Western investment in Russia and UK/EU dependence on Russian natural resources.
These folks are eminently capable of creating the illusion of friction. They faked the Cold War, World War One and World War Two. They are behind 9-11 and the War on Terror. See my articles: "Did Bormann Run Hitler for the Illuminati?'
http://www.savethemales.ca/002026.html
"The Matrix of Manufactured War" http://www.henrymakow.com/001887.html
and "The Coming Shakedown of the US and Iran. http://www.henrymakow.com/001967.html
In "Elite Sets the Stage for WW3" I show how many Rockefeller elder statesmen-for-hire lined up against the Iraq War.
http://www.savethemales.ca/000154.html
SECRET SOCIETIES
It appears that the Illuminati bankers sponsored the liberal and socialist (revolutionary) movements of the last 300 years in order to wrest power from the nobility and church, and to control society through the guise of "liberal democracy."
In 1794 the Duke of Brunswick, issued a Manifesto based on confiscated Illuminati documents. He said, "The ferment that reigns among the people is their work....They began by casting odium on religion..They invented the rights of man ...and urged the people to wrest from their princes the recognition of these supposed rights. The plan they formed for breaking all social ties and destroying all order was revealed in their speeches and acts. They deluged the world with a multitude of publications; they recruited apprenticeships of every rank and every position; they deluded the most perspicacious men by falsely alleging different intentions." ("Light-bearers of Darkness", p.10)
This is confirmed by the "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" which is a Sabbatean document. The author scorns ideas of equality and liberty:
"Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll-parrots...(26) In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents,[i.e. dupes] whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goy States.
28. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove. 29. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people WHICH HAS PLACED AT OUR DISPOSAL, AND HAS, AS IT WERE, GIVEN US THE POWER OF APPOINTMENT." (Protocol 1, emphasis mine)
CONCLUSION
Our political life is essentially an illusion. As early as 1823, Hoene Wronski wrote: "Secret societies are detached into groups distinct and apparently opposed, professing respectively and in turn the most contrary opinions of the day, so as to direct, apart and with confidence, all parties, political, religious, economic, and literary. They, in order to receive common direction, are again united to an unknown center...an Unknown Supreme Committee who governs the world." ("Light-bearers of Darkness", p.2)
The lesson is not to avoid political activity, but to be very selective. The world is in the thrall of a satanic cult. The correct paradigm is humanity versus this cult, its agents and dupes. Unfortunately,these are often the people society considers a "success."
-------
For what I mean by Satanic, see "Our Leaders, Whose Sick Joke? http://www.henrymakow.com/our_leaders_whose_sick_joke.html
_____
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order." (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving your comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com
Our political life is essentially an illusion. As early as 1823, Hoene Wronski wrote: "Secret societies are detached into groups distinct and apparently opposed, professing respectively and in turn the most contrary opinions of the day, so as to direct, apart and with confidence, all parties, political, religious, economic, and literary. They, in order to receive common direction, are again united to an unknown center...an Unknown Supreme Committee who governs the world." ("Light-bearers of Darkness", p.2)
The lesson is not to avoid political activity, but to be very selective. The world is in the thrall of a satanic cult. The correct paradigm is humanity versus this cult, its agents and dupes. Unfortunately,these are often the people society considers a "success."
-------
For what I mean by Satanic, see "Our Leaders, Whose Sick Joke? http://www.henrymakow.com/our_leaders_whose_sick_joke.html
_____
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order." (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving your comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com
Thursday, 24 January 2008
The Economic destruction of IRAN continues despite the fact they are not building a bomb.
By Marcus Salek, Prague
-
The new sanctions against Iran are not about enriching Uranium, they are about destroying another country economically before you invade it to steal its resources. This technique has been done many times before. Chile, Iraq, Yugoslavia, and Latin America are just a few examples.
-
Usually the private IMF or world bank moves in first and loans a country large sums of money for projects they don't need. Then they charge high interest rates and get the country to pledge its resources as collateral. As part of the package, they insist that the country privatize everything, banks, utilities, governmental services, airports, to name a few.
When privatization has left nothing of the state but offices and elected Representatives, they send in NGO groups to destabilize country and create civil strife. Then they use civil strife as a opportunity to get the US/CIA to invade and take over the country based on some bogus human rights motive.
Iran was too smart to fall for the IMF/World bank scenario, so the only thing left was to divide up Iran between the world powers. Then get the world powers to sign a sanction agreement at world HQ, called the UN, and wait for the Iranian economy to collapse. To speed things up, maybe they will stage a fake confrontation in the Persian Gulf.
When privatization has left nothing of the state but offices and elected Representatives, they send in NGO groups to destabilize country and create civil strife. Then they use civil strife as a opportunity to get the US/CIA to invade and take over the country based on some bogus human rights motive.
Iran was too smart to fall for the IMF/World bank scenario, so the only thing left was to divide up Iran between the world powers. Then get the world powers to sign a sanction agreement at world HQ, called the UN, and wait for the Iranian economy to collapse. To speed things up, maybe they will stage a fake confrontation in the Persian Gulf.
New sanctions will soon be in place. I bet the Jewish elite and the Masonic Lucifer sect will be dancing around their fires and hooting like owls tonight! I am sure that John Hagee his Christian Zionist crowd are already on their knees thanking Jesus.
So whats next?
My guess is the "Mad Hatters" that run this world will now increase military spending and get ready for a fake military confrontation as an excuse to invade. Like in Iraq, they will use Depleted Uranium so as to ruin the Iran's future genetic pool. This will make the population control folks, the Rockefeller's, and the Zionists happy.
And the international bankers? What better way to boast the dollar and recover their losses than another war.
The European Union? They take orders from Tel Aviv
China? Perhaps the US blocked Taiwan from getting a seat at the UN in exchange for China's support of new sanctions. The Chinese are business people. They have all those worthless dollars. Why not join the crowd and steal the oil from Iran instead of having to pay for it.
Russia? what gifts were exchanged? That's a mystery.
Israel? They got their paranoid delusions satisfied. Their leaders can prance around the insane asylum and talk about imaginary threats and the Holocaust. Maybe they will celebrate by killing more Palestinians. It's Israels national pastime.
Iran? Even though the government in Tehran don't acknowledge that the sanctions are having an destabilizing effect, A article in today's Independent talks about how bad it is getting in Tehran. It will effect them economically for sure. But it is out of their hands. The sanctions are there for good, even if they stopped enriching Uranium, and they know that.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iranian-people-fear-new-wave-of-sanctions-773164.html
Another endless war is beginning folks, this time everyone is on board the Iranian destruction express except the citizens of the world. They are just trying to have enough money to eat and have a roof over their head. No wonder people don't vote anymore. Why bother.
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal is Microchipped population - Aaron Russo
The truth about 911.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Russo RIP
Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has gone in-depth on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, who ... all » personally told him that the elite's ultimate goal was to create a microchipped population and that the war on terror was a hoax, Rockefeller having predicted an "event" that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan eleven months before 9/11.
Rockefeller also told Russo that his family's foundation had created and bankrolled the women's liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite
Once again the West try’s to Sanction Iran. Will they be successful in destroying the Economy?
Opinion by Marcus Salek, Prague
All five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany have reached an accord on a new draft resolution against Iran over its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment.
Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Germany's foreign minister, said after a meeting in Berlin that the resolution would be presented to the Security Council "in the coming weeks"
A senior US official said the resolution "increases the severity of the sanctions already in place and will also introduce new elements" Perhaps this will be the first phase of preparations for war. Usually, the IMF destroys a country first, like they did in Yugoslavia, and then after 10 years they break up the country. Using UN sanctions is a departure from the norm. The Iranians were too smart to let the IMF mettle in their affairs so sanctions will have to be used to choke the Iranian economy and make it militarily weak before the US invades.
The west claims that the sanctions are a very swift reminder to the Iranians that the six powers are united," But is this true? The text is secret at the moment, so the people don't really know what it says.It has been reported that the US is very pleased, "This is the answer to Tehran"a US spokesman said.
Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Germany's foreign minister, said after a meeting in Berlin that the resolution would be presented to the Security Council "in the coming weeks"
A senior US official said the resolution "increases the severity of the sanctions already in place and will also introduce new elements" Perhaps this will be the first phase of preparations for war. Usually, the IMF destroys a country first, like they did in Yugoslavia, and then after 10 years they break up the country. Using UN sanctions is a departure from the norm. The Iranians were too smart to let the IMF mettle in their affairs so sanctions will have to be used to choke the Iranian economy and make it militarily weak before the US invades.
The west claims that the sanctions are a very swift reminder to the Iranians that the six powers are united," But is this true? The text is secret at the moment, so the people don't really know what it says.It has been reported that the US is very pleased, "This is the answer to Tehran"a US spokesman said.
-
Personally, I got the impression that Tehran really does not give a shit. But, I must admit that listening to our elected leaders talk about the fate of the world is a lot like reading a dell comic book. Does anyone really believe what they say anymore?
-
A US official said the outcome of the meeting flew in the face of Iranian claims that the sanctions issue had driven a wedge through the powers. That may be, but unfortunately, it is still drives a wedge between mankind, which only peace can unite.
A US official said the outcome of the meeting flew in the face of Iranian claims that the sanctions issue had driven a wedge through the powers. That may be, but unfortunately, it is still drives a wedge between mankind, which only peace can unite.
Obviously continues wars and plagues is what the western leaders want. It makes them feel important, but keeping up these endless wars against the Muslim world could be the death of this planet. DU has already been falling over Europe since the Iraq War. I guess our leaders don't care as long as Gods chosen ones who live in Israel have their paranoid delusions satisfied.
-
Officials said that the foreign ministers of the six countries (Britain, Russia, China, France, the US and Germany) had four technical issues to resolve as they sat down to the talks but had ironed out their differences during the course of the two-hour meeting.
-
He said the group had agreed not to distribute the text before presenting it to the other 10 members of the Security Council. I understand that the ministers were to continue their talks over dinner in the German capital on Tuesday. I personally hope they all choke on pretzels. What is their to talk about, how to divide up the country?
Washington and its EU allies have recently been pushing for a third set of economic and trade sanctions against Iran for defying international demands to stop uranium enrichment activities that they fear could be used to make a bomb.
Washington and its EU allies have recently been pushing for a third set of economic and trade sanctions against Iran for defying international demands to stop uranium enrichment activities that they fear could be used to make a bomb.
-
WOW! They are still afraid of a bomb after spending 10 trillion dollars on missile deterrents? if the missiles don't deter, then the taxpayers of Europe, the US, and China should get their money back. My child within me has no fear of the Iranian Bomb because it does not exist. I am afraid of the 400 nuclear warheads in Israel being used as blackmail.
-
Iranian denial
-
Iran denies it is seeking an atomic weapon, insisting its nuclear programme is peaceful and aimed merely at providing energy for its growing population.
-
China and Russia, which have lucrative trade ties with the Islamic republic, have been reluctant to back any more punitive measures.
-
A US national intelligence estimate released in early December reported that Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons programme in 2003.
-
The report's conclusion has significantly undermined US warnings about the Iranian threat.
-
Tehran said on Tuesday that it would not be swayed if new UN sanctions were imposed.
-
Iran denies it is seeking an atomic weapon, insisting its nuclear programme is peaceful and aimed merely at providing energy for its growing population.
-
China and Russia, which have lucrative trade ties with the Islamic republic, have been reluctant to back any more punitive measures.
-
A US national intelligence estimate released in early December reported that Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons programme in 2003.
-
The report's conclusion has significantly undermined US warnings about the Iranian threat.
-
Tehran said on Tuesday that it would not be swayed if new UN sanctions were imposed.
Yada yada yada.......
-
HEY PRESIDENT BUSH. THE ECONOMY IS COLLAPSING. DO YOU THINK ANYONE GIVES A DAMN IF IRAN GETS NUCLEAR POWER OUTSIDE OF YOU AND ISRAEL AND THE ZIONISTS WHO RUN EUROPE?
-
PEOPLE ARE MORE CONCERNED IF THEY WILL HAVE JOBS NEXT MONTH AND FOOD ON THE TABLE AND MONEY TO RETIRE. BUT OBVIOUSLY, THOSE SILLY PEOPLE THAT WE CALL ELECTED REPRESENTIVIES ARE TO DUMB TO NOTICE.
Source: Agencies
Source: Agencies
The Clinton Chronicles
Americans for Honest Government present the truth behind Clinton.
1 hour 45 minutes. "Clinton was the biggest cocaine smuggler in America."
Discover the story behind Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Mena Arkansas cocaine smuggling operation they ran, while Bill was govenor, prior to the presidency. A story you won't believe.
Some people say it is a complete fake, others say its true. You must decide for yourselves. If it is fake, I would like to see the casting calls for this movie!
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
European GM crop cultivation leaps 77 per cent
by Laura Crowley
"At the moment, the only type of GM crop grown in the EU is maize, which was approved in 1998. It is not cultivated for human consumption but for animal feed. The maize contains a gene that defends the crop against the European corn borer, an insect pest that eats the stem, present primarily in southern and middle Europe but moving northwards.
The greatest reported increase in GM crop cultivation is in France, which has quadrupled in size from 5,000 hectares in 1996 to over 21,000 hectares this year. Cultivated acreage in biotech crops has more than doubled in the Czech Republic and Germany, while Spain, the largest cultivator, saw increases of more than 40 per cent."
"At the moment, the only type of GM crop grown in the EU is maize, which was approved in 1998. It is not cultivated for human consumption but for animal feed. The maize contains a gene that defends the crop against the European corn borer, an insect pest that eats the stem, present primarily in southern and middle Europe but moving northwards.
The greatest reported increase in GM crop cultivation is in France, which has quadrupled in size from 5,000 hectares in 1996 to over 21,000 hectares this year. Cultivated acreage in biotech crops has more than doubled in the Czech Republic and Germany, while Spain, the largest cultivator, saw increases of more than 40 per cent."
Sunday, 20 January 2008
Religion: The Hidden Hand Behind "the Kingdom on Earth Deception"
The frontline promoters and propagandists of the 'Kingdom of God on Earth' scenario include all the well known TV evangelical personalities like Pat Robertson, Billy Graham, Robert Shuller, Benny Hinn, Jack Van Impe, Jerry Falwell, Paul & Jan Crouch of Trinity Broadcasting , Jesse Duplantis, Kenneth Copeland, Rod Parsley, Fred Price, Kim Clement, John Hagee, and Kenneth Hagin among others.
-
But their ranks are also swollen with lesser known evangelical, pro-Israel promoters who show up on UHF, cable TV, and radio stations every Sunday morning to pitch the soon-to-be-realized Great Tribulation and End Times "prophecies".
-
A large percentage of these televangelist employ shouting, flamboyant movements, repeated phrases, and various histrionics to pump up the emotions of the audience in order to achieve a very specific technique of brainwashing called 'conversion'.
-
The Illuminated Ones play both sides of the Christianity card to manipulate the gullible into delusion. They either utilize pseudo-historians like Acharya S (The Christ Conspiracy, The Greatest Story Ever Sold) to sell the idea that Christ never even existed, or they use their opposite, the fundamentalist 'Kingdom of God on Earth' promoters, to sell the Apocalypse/Armageddon/End Times package. [Hagee Ministries]
-
The Illuminated Ones play both sides of the Christianity card to manipulate the gullible into delusion. They either utilize pseudo-historians like Acharya S (The Christ Conspiracy, The Greatest Story Ever Sold) to sell the idea that Christ never even existed, or they use their opposite, the fundamentalist 'Kingdom of God on Earth' promoters, to sell the Apocalypse/Armageddon/End Times package. [Hagee Ministries]
-
Either way, the naive and gullible lose. They either lose their spiritual foundation altogether and acquiesce to the humanistic or Masonic Gnosticism ploys, or they go whole hog into cheering for Armageddon and the End Times scenario to unfold so they can "get it over with" and race into the arms of 'Jesus' who will greet them from His golden throne in the newly rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem. These End Time 'prophecies' have no relationship whatsoever to the words or earthly mission of Jesus Christ. .
-
Sincere Christians need to recall an important statement that Christ made while on Earth. Christ said that " My Father's Kingdom is not of this world". Christ was specifically rejecting the "prophecies" being promoted by a dominant Jewish sect of the day known as Pharisees. The Pharisee priests had been predicting that a Messiah would come to earth and establish a "Kingdom of God' and rule from his throne in Jerusalem, after overthrowing the Roman oppressors who ruled Judea at the time.
-
Sincere Christians need to recall an important statement that Christ made while on Earth. Christ said that " My Father's Kingdom is not of this world". Christ was specifically rejecting the "prophecies" being promoted by a dominant Jewish sect of the day known as Pharisees. The Pharisee priests had been predicting that a Messiah would come to earth and establish a "Kingdom of God' and rule from his throne in Jerusalem, after overthrowing the Roman oppressors who ruled Judea at the time.
-
This is EXACTLY the same tale that the above named 'Christian' fundamentalist preachers are selling to multitudes of deceived people around the world. It's Pharisee-ism plain and simple!
-
Once this realization sinks in-and you need to remember that it was the Pharisee priests who got Pontius Pilate to condemn Christ to death- you can then begin to remove the mist from your eyes and recognize these fundamentalist 'Christian' propagandists for what they are-- agents of the satanic British oligarchy.
-
Cecil Rhodes: How the NWO, Rockefeller and the CIA changed the Bible to support their cause
"In order to move the world into an anti-Christian new world order, the British elites needed to gradually replace the authentic English Bible with a counterfeit reflecting their own belief system"
-
The Long Reach of Cecil Rhodes:
Edinburgh ~ Home of Thomas Nelson Publisher
During the thirty year period in which B.F. Westcott and F.J.A. Hort labored in the creation of a New Greek Testament and revision of the English Bible, they also founded and guided organizations dealing in matters occult and conspiratorial. The secret societies they founded were intimately interlocked with and, in some cases, had direct influence on the power elites who laid the groundwork for the federation, expansion and consolidation of the British Empire and, by extension, a one world government. The progeny of Westcott and Hort includes not only the multitude of modern bible versions based upon corrupt manuscripts, but also the Society for Psychical Research, which investigated and established the principles of modern Spiritualism and Psychology, and the S.P.R.'s PAC, the Fabian Society, which collaborated with the Rhodes society and founded the London School of Economics and Political Science.
To deny the connection between Westcott and Hort's revision of the Received Greek Text using gnostic manuscripts and their deep involvement in occult societies is to pretend not to see the obvious. In order to move the world into an anti-Christian new world order, the British elites needed to gradually replace the authentic English Bible with a counterfeit reflecting their own belief system. Carrying forward the Cambridge New Testament scheme, members of the Rhodes Round Table and the Council for National Policy have produced bibles based on the corrupt Westcott-Hort Greek Testament for global distribution. Carroll Quigley noted that John Buchan, who was close to Lord Milner, eventually became a partner in the publishing firm of his old classmate, Thomas A. Nelson, which is based in -- Edinburgh, Scotland!
"Buchan was not a member of the inner core of the Milner Group, but was close to it and was rewarded in 1935 by being raised to a barony as Lord Tweedsmuir and sent to Canada as Governor-General. He is important because he is (with Lionel Curtis) one of the few members of the inner circles of the Milner Group who have written about it in a published work. In his autobiography, Pilgrim's Way, (Boston, 1940) he gives a brief outline of the personnel of the Kindergarten and their subsequent achievements, and a brilliant analysis of Milner himself. . .
The Long Reach of Cecil Rhodes:
Edinburgh ~ Home of Thomas Nelson Publisher
During the thirty year period in which B.F. Westcott and F.J.A. Hort labored in the creation of a New Greek Testament and revision of the English Bible, they also founded and guided organizations dealing in matters occult and conspiratorial. The secret societies they founded were intimately interlocked with and, in some cases, had direct influence on the power elites who laid the groundwork for the federation, expansion and consolidation of the British Empire and, by extension, a one world government. The progeny of Westcott and Hort includes not only the multitude of modern bible versions based upon corrupt manuscripts, but also the Society for Psychical Research, which investigated and established the principles of modern Spiritualism and Psychology, and the S.P.R.'s PAC, the Fabian Society, which collaborated with the Rhodes society and founded the London School of Economics and Political Science.
To deny the connection between Westcott and Hort's revision of the Received Greek Text using gnostic manuscripts and their deep involvement in occult societies is to pretend not to see the obvious. In order to move the world into an anti-Christian new world order, the British elites needed to gradually replace the authentic English Bible with a counterfeit reflecting their own belief system. Carrying forward the Cambridge New Testament scheme, members of the Rhodes Round Table and the Council for National Policy have produced bibles based on the corrupt Westcott-Hort Greek Testament for global distribution. Carroll Quigley noted that John Buchan, who was close to Lord Milner, eventually became a partner in the publishing firm of his old classmate, Thomas A. Nelson, which is based in -- Edinburgh, Scotland!
"Buchan was not a member of the inner core of the Milner Group, but was close to it and was rewarded in 1935 by being raised to a barony as Lord Tweedsmuir and sent to Canada as Governor-General. He is important because he is (with Lionel Curtis) one of the few members of the inner circles of the Milner Group who have written about it in a published work. In his autobiography, Pilgrim's Way, (Boston, 1940) he gives a brief outline of the personnel of the Kindergarten and their subsequent achievements, and a brilliant analysis of Milner himself. . .
-
"Buchan went to Brasenose College, but, as he says of himself, 'I lived a good deal at Balliol and my closest friends were of that college.' He mentions as his closest friends Hillaire Belloc,... T.A. Nelson,... Edward Wood (the future Lord Halifax). . .
"Buchan went to South Africa in 1901 on Milner's personal invitation, to be his private secretary, but stayed only two years. . . .he left in 1903 to take an important position in Egypt. This appointment was mysteriously canceled. . .it is. . .likely that Milner changed his mind because of Buchan's rapidly declining enthusiasm for federation. This was a subject on which Milner and other members of his Group were adamant for many years. By 1915 most members of the Group began to believe that federation was impossible, and, as a compromise took what we know now as the Commonwealth of Nations -- that is, a group of nations joined together by common ideals and allegiances rather than a fixed political organization. . .The present Commonwealth is in reality the compromises worked out when the details of the Milner Group clashed with the reality of political forces.
"As a result of Buchan's failure to obtain the appointment of Egypt, he continued to practice law in London for three years, finally abandoning it to become a partner in the publishing firm of classmate Thomas A. Nelson (1906-1916). . ." 107.
"Buchan went to Brasenose College, but, as he says of himself, 'I lived a good deal at Balliol and my closest friends were of that college.' He mentions as his closest friends Hillaire Belloc,... T.A. Nelson,... Edward Wood (the future Lord Halifax). . .
"Buchan went to South Africa in 1901 on Milner's personal invitation, to be his private secretary, but stayed only two years. . . .he left in 1903 to take an important position in Egypt. This appointment was mysteriously canceled. . .it is. . .likely that Milner changed his mind because of Buchan's rapidly declining enthusiasm for federation. This was a subject on which Milner and other members of his Group were adamant for many years. By 1915 most members of the Group began to believe that federation was impossible, and, as a compromise took what we know now as the Commonwealth of Nations -- that is, a group of nations joined together by common ideals and allegiances rather than a fixed political organization. . .The present Commonwealth is in reality the compromises worked out when the details of the Milner Group clashed with the reality of political forces.
"As a result of Buchan's failure to obtain the appointment of Egypt, he continued to practice law in London for three years, finally abandoning it to become a partner in the publishing firm of classmate Thomas A. Nelson (1906-1916). . ." 107.
-
John Buchan had special regard for Lord Haldane, the Co-Efficient who with Lord Grey was intensely loyal to Milner. Haldane and Lord Grey were staunch advocates of British imperialism, the Boer War, and the hard line against Germany that precipitated World War I.
"'What chiefly attracted me to Haldane was his loyalty to Milner. Milner thought him the ablest man in public life, abler even than Arthur Balfour, and alone of his former Liberal allies Haldane stood by him on every count.' Haldane, with Roseberry Asquith and Earl Grey, had formed the Liberal League to support liberal imperialism, with which Milner was closely associated." 108.
Considering John Buchan's close relationships within the inner circle of the Milner Group and the mutual esteem between John Buchan and Lord Milner, it is conceivable that Buchan was commissioned by Milner to direct the Bible publishing firm of Thomas Nelson toward furthering the objectives of Cecil Rhodes.
The Thomas Nelson Publishers website provides a brief reference concerning Buchan's contribution to the company, naturally omitting mention of Buchan's membership in Cecil Rhodes' Round Table:
"In the early years of the twentieth century. . .The business was being managed primarily by George M. Brown (Thomas Nelson's son-in-law) and John Buchan, a noted novelist (of such popular works as Prester John and The Thirty-Nine Steps), biographer, and political correspondent. John Buchan, a close friend of Tommy Nelson became instrumental in expanding the company's offerings of classic works and educational resources.
"Buchan wrote, 'On the eve of the [first world] war we must have been one of the largest businesses of the kind in the world, issuing cheap editions of every kind of literature not only in English, but in French, German, Magyar, and Spanish.'" 109.
Thomas Nelson is today the largest and one of the oldest Bible publishers in the world and also a leading publisher of religious books. Thomas Nelson also takes credit for the debut of the New Testament of the Revised Standard Version (RSV) in 1946.
In 1969, Sam Moore, who was president of the Council for National Policy from 1984-85, bought Thomas Nelson Publishers and became its CEO and President. His brother, Charles Moore, became vice president of Thomas Nelson and was also a member of the CNP.
In 1976, Nelson Publisher initiated the New King James Version. Two meetings of the North American Overview Committee met at Nashville and Chicago in 1975 to assist in preparing guidelines for the NKJV. Members of that committee and a Nashville Convocation of 1984 included the following high profile members of the Religious Roundtable and Council for National Policy: Tim LaHaye, D. James Kennedy, Jerry Falwell, Ben Haden, Mary C. Crowley, W.A. Criswell, E.V. Hill, Henry Morris, Bill Bright and Charles Stanley. 110.
Unholy Hands on God's Word is the transcript of a 1996 radio interview of Judy Pinalto, who describes the composition of the New King James Translation and Review committees which included several members of the CNP and other Reconstructionist organizations. In this presentation, Judy demonstrates the dominionist slant of the NKJV:
"The big problem with these counterfeit Bibles is not only the expunging of verses but the altering of verses. If you take a look at the backbone of this political movement, this Reconstructionist social gospel, they use from the modern NIV and the New American Standard, out of Matthew 28, they have altered the great commission. This is where, I think, one of the great delusion, the great deception, has come in. In the modern versions, the corrupt versions, it says that the great commission is to, 'Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations.' This is the verse that they use to justify taking turf.
John Buchan had special regard for Lord Haldane, the Co-Efficient who with Lord Grey was intensely loyal to Milner. Haldane and Lord Grey were staunch advocates of British imperialism, the Boer War, and the hard line against Germany that precipitated World War I.
"'What chiefly attracted me to Haldane was his loyalty to Milner. Milner thought him the ablest man in public life, abler even than Arthur Balfour, and alone of his former Liberal allies Haldane stood by him on every count.' Haldane, with Roseberry Asquith and Earl Grey, had formed the Liberal League to support liberal imperialism, with which Milner was closely associated." 108.
Considering John Buchan's close relationships within the inner circle of the Milner Group and the mutual esteem between John Buchan and Lord Milner, it is conceivable that Buchan was commissioned by Milner to direct the Bible publishing firm of Thomas Nelson toward furthering the objectives of Cecil Rhodes.
The Thomas Nelson Publishers website provides a brief reference concerning Buchan's contribution to the company, naturally omitting mention of Buchan's membership in Cecil Rhodes' Round Table:
"In the early years of the twentieth century. . .The business was being managed primarily by George M. Brown (Thomas Nelson's son-in-law) and John Buchan, a noted novelist (of such popular works as Prester John and The Thirty-Nine Steps), biographer, and political correspondent. John Buchan, a close friend of Tommy Nelson became instrumental in expanding the company's offerings of classic works and educational resources.
"Buchan wrote, 'On the eve of the [first world] war we must have been one of the largest businesses of the kind in the world, issuing cheap editions of every kind of literature not only in English, but in French, German, Magyar, and Spanish.'" 109.
Thomas Nelson is today the largest and one of the oldest Bible publishers in the world and also a leading publisher of religious books. Thomas Nelson also takes credit for the debut of the New Testament of the Revised Standard Version (RSV) in 1946.
In 1969, Sam Moore, who was president of the Council for National Policy from 1984-85, bought Thomas Nelson Publishers and became its CEO and President. His brother, Charles Moore, became vice president of Thomas Nelson and was also a member of the CNP.
In 1976, Nelson Publisher initiated the New King James Version. Two meetings of the North American Overview Committee met at Nashville and Chicago in 1975 to assist in preparing guidelines for the NKJV. Members of that committee and a Nashville Convocation of 1984 included the following high profile members of the Religious Roundtable and Council for National Policy: Tim LaHaye, D. James Kennedy, Jerry Falwell, Ben Haden, Mary C. Crowley, W.A. Criswell, E.V. Hill, Henry Morris, Bill Bright and Charles Stanley. 110.
Unholy Hands on God's Word is the transcript of a 1996 radio interview of Judy Pinalto, who describes the composition of the New King James Translation and Review committees which included several members of the CNP and other Reconstructionist organizations. In this presentation, Judy demonstrates the dominionist slant of the NKJV:
"The big problem with these counterfeit Bibles is not only the expunging of verses but the altering of verses. If you take a look at the backbone of this political movement, this Reconstructionist social gospel, they use from the modern NIV and the New American Standard, out of Matthew 28, they have altered the great commission. This is where, I think, one of the great delusion, the great deception, has come in. In the modern versions, the corrupt versions, it says that the great commission is to, 'Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations.' This is the verse that they use to justify taking turf.
-
"In the King James Bible, the correct translation of that verse is, "Go ye, therefore, and teach all nations." In other words, the great commission was to preach the gospel; it wasn't to take numbers, it wasn't to take disciples, it wasn't to take the nations, take turf. That is how they have used the modern versions to corrupt the doctrine and to create this heretical position that is going on today. So, on these Bible Committees are men who have other agendas." 111.
Corrupted versions of the Bible were also used by the Rockefeller-funded Summer Institute of Linguistics to facilitate the takeover of Latin America. Instead of translating the Bible literally, SIL preferred a method of translation called dynamic equivalency which permitted the translator to alter the language of Scripture, ostensibly to adapt Scripture to the culture. Two well-known examples of dynamic equivalency are Today's English Version (Good News for Modern Man) and the Living Bible. In 1975, John Beekman, translations coordinator for Wycliffe Bibles International, gave his unreserved endorsement to the Living Bible, which is a mere paraphrase of the Word of God: "The Living Bible is the most readable and the most natural English translation available." 112.
"In the King James Bible, the correct translation of that verse is, "Go ye, therefore, and teach all nations." In other words, the great commission was to preach the gospel; it wasn't to take numbers, it wasn't to take disciples, it wasn't to take the nations, take turf. That is how they have used the modern versions to corrupt the doctrine and to create this heretical position that is going on today. So, on these Bible Committees are men who have other agendas." 111.
Corrupted versions of the Bible were also used by the Rockefeller-funded Summer Institute of Linguistics to facilitate the takeover of Latin America. Instead of translating the Bible literally, SIL preferred a method of translation called dynamic equivalency which permitted the translator to alter the language of Scripture, ostensibly to adapt Scripture to the culture. Two well-known examples of dynamic equivalency are Today's English Version (Good News for Modern Man) and the Living Bible. In 1975, John Beekman, translations coordinator for Wycliffe Bibles International, gave his unreserved endorsement to the Living Bible, which is a mere paraphrase of the Word of God: "The Living Bible is the most readable and the most natural English translation available." 112.
-
The authors of Thy Will Be Done suggest that, as SIL created written languages for illiterate tribes, it changed words that had warlike connotations in order to pacify those tribes that would otherwise oppose their new masters. The implication is that this practice was carried over into SIL's translation of bibles. An incurable ecumenicist, Townsend's admiration for a Catholic priest indicated that linguistics was used to neutralize resistance among the Indian tribes of Latin America:
"I am a loving fundamentalist. I believe in working with anyone who will help get the Bible to the Indians. . . .one of the heroes whom I admire the most is the celebrated Father Bartolome de las Casas. This worthy Dominican, as all well remember, made use of the Sacred History in the Indian languages of Guatemala in order to draw the Indians to the faith and to peace. We too, so insignificant in comparison with that great hero of the cross, can indeed follow his example as regards the use of linguistics." 113.
Incredibly, the Wycliffe Bible Translators, who were trained in modern anthropological methods and linguistics, were employed by Nelson Rockefeller and the CIA to gather anthropological and psychological information on Latin American tribes. In return, Wycliffe was recompensed with land, high-tech equipment and expensive airplanes, courtesy of the American government and corporations.
"SIL had helped gather anthropological information on the Tarascan Indians that ended up in Nelson Rockefeller's intelligence files. The files contained references to reveal behavioral patterns among Indian people in everything from socialization (including aggressive tendencies) and personality traits, drives, emotions, and language structure, to political intrigue, kinship ties, traditional authority, mineral resources, exploitation, and labor relations. Rockefeller called these data the Strategic Index of Latin America." 114.
The indigenous peoples of Latin America did not subvert their own governments, but rather the American robber barons overthrew legitimate governments and then used Wycliffe Bible Translators to bring native populations into subjection. Through the misapplication of Scripture, Cam Townsend taught the Latin American tribes to passively accept the overthrow of their governments and to submit to the puppet dictators installed by the multinational corporations:
"Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) was hired by military dictatorships and civilian governments, often headed by Nelson's allies, to pacify the tribes and integrate them into national economies increasingly brought into the North American market. SIL used the Bible to teach indigenous people to 'obey the government, for all authority comes from God.'" 115.
-
The authors of Thy Will Be Done suggest that, as SIL created written languages for illiterate tribes, it changed words that had warlike connotations in order to pacify those tribes that would otherwise oppose their new masters. The implication is that this practice was carried over into SIL's translation of bibles. An incurable ecumenicist, Townsend's admiration for a Catholic priest indicated that linguistics was used to neutralize resistance among the Indian tribes of Latin America:
"I am a loving fundamentalist. I believe in working with anyone who will help get the Bible to the Indians. . . .one of the heroes whom I admire the most is the celebrated Father Bartolome de las Casas. This worthy Dominican, as all well remember, made use of the Sacred History in the Indian languages of Guatemala in order to draw the Indians to the faith and to peace. We too, so insignificant in comparison with that great hero of the cross, can indeed follow his example as regards the use of linguistics." 113.
Incredibly, the Wycliffe Bible Translators, who were trained in modern anthropological methods and linguistics, were employed by Nelson Rockefeller and the CIA to gather anthropological and psychological information on Latin American tribes. In return, Wycliffe was recompensed with land, high-tech equipment and expensive airplanes, courtesy of the American government and corporations.
"SIL had helped gather anthropological information on the Tarascan Indians that ended up in Nelson Rockefeller's intelligence files. The files contained references to reveal behavioral patterns among Indian people in everything from socialization (including aggressive tendencies) and personality traits, drives, emotions, and language structure, to political intrigue, kinship ties, traditional authority, mineral resources, exploitation, and labor relations. Rockefeller called these data the Strategic Index of Latin America." 114.
The indigenous peoples of Latin America did not subvert their own governments, but rather the American robber barons overthrew legitimate governments and then used Wycliffe Bible Translators to bring native populations into subjection. Through the misapplication of Scripture, Cam Townsend taught the Latin American tribes to passively accept the overthrow of their governments and to submit to the puppet dictators installed by the multinational corporations:
"Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) was hired by military dictatorships and civilian governments, often headed by Nelson's allies, to pacify the tribes and integrate them into national economies increasingly brought into the North American market. SIL used the Bible to teach indigenous people to 'obey the government, for all authority comes from God.'" 115.
-
Excerpts from a article by By Barbara Aho: http://educate-yourself.org/cn/councilfornationalpolicyB09jun05.shtml
-
Saturday, 19 January 2008
The Bilderberg pick for presidental candidate is waiting in the wings.
Michael Bloomberg with David Rockefeller, George Pataki, and Ronald LauderEwen MacAskill
Saturday January 19, 2008
The Guardian
The multibillionaire businessman and mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg, is pushing ahead with plans to throw himself into the US presidential contest as an independent candidate this spring.
Bloomberg, who has a personal fortune that would allow him to mount the most expensive campaign in US political history, could seriously damage the chances of the Democratic candidate.
Bloomberg is waiting to see the outcome of the Republican and Democratic races before deciding whether to announce his candidacy in March. But his staff want him to run and there is a blueprint drawn up for contesting the 50 states.
Ron Paul - Electability - Censored by Fox 1-10-08
Watch how Ron Paul makes Fox News and the other
candidates look like fools!
Friday, 18 January 2008
Zionist occupied Europe increases sanctions on Iran
By Marcus Salek, Prague
In today's article in Asian Times, Olivier Guitta does a very good job analysing how much Europe faces up to Iranian threat.
"A not well-known fact shows Europe's determination vis-a-vis Iran: the European Union has gone further than the two United Nations. Security Council resolutions against Iran actually require. It has sanctioned additional entities and banned some additional transactions."
The article can be found here: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JA18Ak03.html
Now with most governments in Europe under control of the closet Zionists, it looks like Europe will continue to do what they are told.
In today's article in Asian Times, Olivier Guitta does a very good job analysing how much Europe faces up to Iranian threat.
"A not well-known fact shows Europe's determination vis-a-vis Iran: the European Union has gone further than the two United Nations. Security Council resolutions against Iran actually require. It has sanctioned additional entities and banned some additional transactions."
The article can be found here: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JA18Ak03.html
Now with most governments in Europe under control of the closet Zionists, it looks like Europe will continue to do what they are told.
-
Last year, German chancellor Merkel led the Avant Garde for Israel, making sure "hate laws" got passed in every EU country. Now the citizens of Europe will have to shut up and understand just who their masters are, or go to jail.
-
This year, ex-mossad Zionist agent Sarkozy of France takes over the charge. He has been quite forceful and consistent on his statements regarding Iran, business be damned.
-
While most Europeans live in a state of reality denial, afraid to think the wrong thoughts, it is obvious to me that Sarkozy's allegiance's lie not with Europe, but with Israel. Why not? It is not Israels children that have to do the dying in Middle East wars.
USA plunges into poverty
The number of Washington residents living in poverty is up sharply since 2001, with increases in every county except Garfield, according to new figures from the U.S. Census Bureau.
The agency reported this week that 12 percent of the people in the state were living in poverty in 2005, the latest year for which figures are available. In 2001, just 9.9 percent of the state's population was in poverty.
The state had 732,049 people living in poverty in 2005, compared with 586,456 people in 2001, the bureau said. The federal poverty line in 2005 was $19,350 for a family of four, the AP reports.
There are three versions of the federal poverty measure: the poverty thresholds (which are the primary version) and the poverty guidelines. The Census Bureau issues the poverty thresholds, which are generally used for statistical purposes—for example, to estimate the number of people in poverty nationwide each year and classify them by type of residence, race, and other social, economic, and demographic characteristics. The Department of Health and Human Services issues the poverty guidelines for administrative purposes—for instance, to determine whether a person or family is eligible for assistance through various federal programs.
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has defined poverty in absolute terms. When the Johnson administration declared "war on poverty" in 1964, it chose an absolute measure. The "absolute poverty line" is the threshold below which families or individuals are considered to be lacking the resources to meet the basic needs for healthy living; having insufficient income to provide the food, shelter and clothing needed to preserve health.
The "Orshansky Poverty Thresholds" form the basis for the current measure of poverty in the U.S. Mollie Orshansky was an economist working for the Social Security Administration (SSA). Her work appeared at an opportune moment. Orshansky's article was published later in the same year that Johnson declared war on poverty. Since her measure was absolute (i.e., did not depend on other events), it made it possible to objectively answer whether the U.S. government was "winning" this war. The newly formed United States Office of Economic Opportunity adopted the lower of the Orshansky poverty thresholds for statistical, planning, and budgetary purposes in May 1965.
The Bureau of the Budget adopted Orshansky's definition for statistical use in all Executive departments in 1965. The measure gave a range of income cutoffs, or thresholds, adjusted for factors such as family size, sex of the family head, number of children under 18 years old, and farm or non-farm residence. The economy food plan (the least costly of four nutritionally adequate food plans designed by the Department of Agriculture) was at the core of this definition of poverty.
The Department of Agriculture found that families of three or more persons spent about one third of their after-tax income on food. For these families, poverty thresholds were set at three times the cost of the economy food plan. Different procedures were used for calculating poverty thresholds for two-person households and persons living alone. Annual updates of the SSA poverty thresholds were based on price changes in the economy food plan.
Two changes were made to the poverty definition in 1969. Thresholds for non-farm families were tied to annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rather than changes in the cost of the economy food plan. Farm thresholds were raised from 70 to 85% of the non-farm levels.
In 1981, further changes were made to the poverty definition. Separate thresholds for "farm" and "female-householder" families were eliminated. The largest family size category became "nine persons or more."
Apart from these changes, the U.S. government's approach to measuring poverty has remained static for the past forty years.
The agency reported this week that 12 percent of the people in the state were living in poverty in 2005, the latest year for which figures are available. In 2001, just 9.9 percent of the state's population was in poverty.
The state had 732,049 people living in poverty in 2005, compared with 586,456 people in 2001, the bureau said. The federal poverty line in 2005 was $19,350 for a family of four, the AP reports.
There are three versions of the federal poverty measure: the poverty thresholds (which are the primary version) and the poverty guidelines. The Census Bureau issues the poverty thresholds, which are generally used for statistical purposes—for example, to estimate the number of people in poverty nationwide each year and classify them by type of residence, race, and other social, economic, and demographic characteristics. The Department of Health and Human Services issues the poverty guidelines for administrative purposes—for instance, to determine whether a person or family is eligible for assistance through various federal programs.
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has defined poverty in absolute terms. When the Johnson administration declared "war on poverty" in 1964, it chose an absolute measure. The "absolute poverty line" is the threshold below which families or individuals are considered to be lacking the resources to meet the basic needs for healthy living; having insufficient income to provide the food, shelter and clothing needed to preserve health.
The "Orshansky Poverty Thresholds" form the basis for the current measure of poverty in the U.S. Mollie Orshansky was an economist working for the Social Security Administration (SSA). Her work appeared at an opportune moment. Orshansky's article was published later in the same year that Johnson declared war on poverty. Since her measure was absolute (i.e., did not depend on other events), it made it possible to objectively answer whether the U.S. government was "winning" this war. The newly formed United States Office of Economic Opportunity adopted the lower of the Orshansky poverty thresholds for statistical, planning, and budgetary purposes in May 1965.
The Bureau of the Budget adopted Orshansky's definition for statistical use in all Executive departments in 1965. The measure gave a range of income cutoffs, or thresholds, adjusted for factors such as family size, sex of the family head, number of children under 18 years old, and farm or non-farm residence. The economy food plan (the least costly of four nutritionally adequate food plans designed by the Department of Agriculture) was at the core of this definition of poverty.
The Department of Agriculture found that families of three or more persons spent about one third of their after-tax income on food. For these families, poverty thresholds were set at three times the cost of the economy food plan. Different procedures were used for calculating poverty thresholds for two-person households and persons living alone. Annual updates of the SSA poverty thresholds were based on price changes in the economy food plan.
Two changes were made to the poverty definition in 1969. Thresholds for non-farm families were tied to annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rather than changes in the cost of the economy food plan. Farm thresholds were raised from 70 to 85% of the non-farm levels.
In 1981, further changes were made to the poverty definition. Separate thresholds for "farm" and "female-householder" families were eliminated. The largest family size category became "nine persons or more."
Apart from these changes, the U.S. government's approach to measuring poverty has remained static for the past forty years.
URL: http://english.pravda.ru/business/finance/103479-poverty_usa-0
Chief rabbi thanks Bush for 'war against Iraq' [and the murder of millions of civilians]
During a short verbal exchange Wednesday at the Ben-Gurion Airport Terminal, Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi Yona Metzger thanked President George W. Bush for the US's military intervention in Iraq.
"I want to thank you for your support of Israel and in particular for waging a war against Iraq," Metzger told Bush, according to the chief rabbi's spokesman.
Bush reportedly answered that the chief rabbi's words "warmed his heart."
Metzger's stand on the Iraqi war, while reflecting the Israeli majority and Orthodox Jewry, is not shared with most US Jews. The American Jewish Committee's annual Survey of American Jewish Opinion, published last year, found that 70 percent of US Jews disapprove of the Iraq war, with 28% backing it.
In a related story, Metzger was chosen as one of the 12 most influential religious figures in the world for a CBS documentary called In God's Name that appeared at the end of December.
Newsweek also devoted a story to the documentary complete with pictures of Metzger and the other religious leaders.
Metzger was chosen along with figures such as the 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet, the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams and heads of the Sikh and Muslim religions.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1198517338408&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
"I want to thank you for your support of Israel and in particular for waging a war against Iraq," Metzger told Bush, according to the chief rabbi's spokesman.
Bush reportedly answered that the chief rabbi's words "warmed his heart."
Metzger's stand on the Iraqi war, while reflecting the Israeli majority and Orthodox Jewry, is not shared with most US Jews. The American Jewish Committee's annual Survey of American Jewish Opinion, published last year, found that 70 percent of US Jews disapprove of the Iraq war, with 28% backing it.
In a related story, Metzger was chosen as one of the 12 most influential religious figures in the world for a CBS documentary called In God's Name that appeared at the end of December.
Newsweek also devoted a story to the documentary complete with pictures of Metzger and the other religious leaders.
Metzger was chosen along with figures such as the 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet, the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams and heads of the Sikh and Muslim religions.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1198517338408&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Thursday, 17 January 2008
American Election Fraud: Paypal blocks your payment if your name sounds Islamic
Granny warriors raised enough money for a vote recount in NH. But paypal block the money so they missed the deadline with the secretary of state.
Why?
PayPal blocked the payment to the New Hampshire Secretary of State..
Claiming that one or more of the contributors for the recount had "Islamic sounding name(s) and could be related to terrorists"
Who owns PayPal? Ebay owns PayPal..
The CEO of Ebay is on Romneys Steering Committee.
Why?
PayPal blocked the payment to the New Hampshire Secretary of State..
Claiming that one or more of the contributors for the recount had "Islamic sounding name(s) and could be related to terrorists"
Who owns PayPal? Ebay owns PayPal..
The CEO of Ebay is on Romneys Steering Committee.
Wednesday, 16 January 2008
FROM AMERICA TO CHINESECA
By Marcus Salek, Prague
WITH THE HELP OF AMERICAN CORPORATIONS, WALMART, AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, CHINA IS GOING STRONG. ITS INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING REBUILT, ITS FACTORY'S ARE BUZZING, AND ITS PEOPLE ARE GETTING PROSPEROUS. ALL OF THIS FINANCED BY AMERICAN CORPORATIONS, THE US GOVERNMENT, THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND ITS PRINTING PRESSES. AND, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, OUR AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES ARE TRAINING CHINESE ENGINEERS AT TAXPAYERS EXPENSE.-
THE REAGAN/THACHER BS OF THE 80’S HAS COME TO BE REALITY. WE HAVE A MARKET DRIVEN/ FREE TRADE ECONOMY, EXCEPT AMERICAN WAGES ARE LOWER THAN IN THE 1970s AND SOON AMERICANS WON'T EARN ENOUGH MONEY TO BUY ANYTHING BUT FOOD.
-
AMERICA IS A POOR COUNTRY LIVING UNDER THE ILLUSION THAT THEY ARE RICH. THIS ILLUSION IS BECAUSE OF EASY CREDIT. MOST AMERICANS HAVE A NEGATIVE NET WORTH AND WILL NEVER ACTUALLY OWN THEIR HOUSE OR THEIR CAR.
SOON AMERICAN WORKERS WILL BE CHINA'S FACTORY SLAVES AND A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY. AMERICANS HOMES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS WILL BE CHINESE HOMES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS.
WILL 20,000,000 MANUFACTURING JOBS GONE FROM THE UNITED STATES DURING THE LAST 3 DECADES. THERE IS NO HOPE TO RECOVER OUR STANDARD OF LIVING. THERE ARE NO MORE HENRY FORDS. THERE ARE NO MORE FAMILY OWNED BUSINESSES. NO MORE MOM AND POP STORES. JUST GIGANTIC MULTINATIONALS, WHICH OWE ALLEGIANCE ONLY TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND MAKING MONEY. THEY CARE NOTHING ABOUT AMERICA OR ITS CONSTITUTION. THEY ARE A PLAGUE ON OUR COUNTRY AND TO HUMANITY. LIKE A SWARM OF LOCUSTS THEY ENCIRCLE THE GLOBE DESTROYING ALL CULTURES IN THEIR PATH. THEY ARE WORRIED ABOUT OVERPOPULATION BECAUSE THEY WANT TO OWN EVERYTHING AND HUMANS TAKE UP SPACE.
AMERICA HAS LOST ITS ABILITY TO MANUFACTURE CONSUMER GOODS. 96 PERCENT OF CLOTHES ARE MADE OFF SHORE. AMERICA HAS LOST THEIR SKILLED WORKERS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO. THERE IS NO POINT GOING TO COLLEGE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO JOBS. WE MAKE NOTHING THAT IS EXPORTABLE EXCEPT WEAPONS. OUR CORN FIELDS AND FIELDS OF GRAIN ARE ALL POLLUTED WITH GM CROPS. OUR MEDICINE CURES NOTHING. THE ENTIRE US GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS, NOT THE PEOPLE WHO ELECT THEM.
THE BIGGEST THREAT TO AMERICAS SECURITY IS THE CORPORATE ENTITY AND PERSONHOOD. A FACELESS ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE WHICH IS BECOMING BIGGER THAN GOVERNMENT ITSELF. IT HAS NO CONTROLS AND UNLIMITED RESOURCES AND MONEY. CORPORATIONS ARE THE NEW WORLD ORDER. NEARLY 70% OF ALL STATE UTILITIES ARE PRIVATIZED. ROADS ARE PRIVATIZED. SOON THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE PRIVATIZED AND SOLD TO CORPORATIONS WHERE PEOPLE WILL NOT HAVE VOICE, LIKE THE FEUDALISM OF THE MIDDLE AGES. THEY CONTROL OUR FOOD PRODUCTION, OUR HEALTH, AND THE WATER WE DRINK. THEY ARE EVEN TRYING TO TAX HUMANS ON OUR CO2 EMISSIONS. MOST NATION STATES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR ASSETS IN THE NAME OF COMPETITION, PRIVATIZATION, RESTRUCTURING, THE WTO, THE IMF, AND THE WORLD BANK.
SOON AMERICAN WORKERS WILL BE CHINA'S FACTORY SLAVES AND A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY. AMERICANS HOMES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS WILL BE CHINESE HOMES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS.
WILL 20,000,000 MANUFACTURING JOBS GONE FROM THE UNITED STATES DURING THE LAST 3 DECADES. THERE IS NO HOPE TO RECOVER OUR STANDARD OF LIVING. THERE ARE NO MORE HENRY FORDS. THERE ARE NO MORE FAMILY OWNED BUSINESSES. NO MORE MOM AND POP STORES. JUST GIGANTIC MULTINATIONALS, WHICH OWE ALLEGIANCE ONLY TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND MAKING MONEY. THEY CARE NOTHING ABOUT AMERICA OR ITS CONSTITUTION. THEY ARE A PLAGUE ON OUR COUNTRY AND TO HUMANITY. LIKE A SWARM OF LOCUSTS THEY ENCIRCLE THE GLOBE DESTROYING ALL CULTURES IN THEIR PATH. THEY ARE WORRIED ABOUT OVERPOPULATION BECAUSE THEY WANT TO OWN EVERYTHING AND HUMANS TAKE UP SPACE.
AMERICA HAS LOST ITS ABILITY TO MANUFACTURE CONSUMER GOODS. 96 PERCENT OF CLOTHES ARE MADE OFF SHORE. AMERICA HAS LOST THEIR SKILLED WORKERS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO. THERE IS NO POINT GOING TO COLLEGE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO JOBS. WE MAKE NOTHING THAT IS EXPORTABLE EXCEPT WEAPONS. OUR CORN FIELDS AND FIELDS OF GRAIN ARE ALL POLLUTED WITH GM CROPS. OUR MEDICINE CURES NOTHING. THE ENTIRE US GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS, NOT THE PEOPLE WHO ELECT THEM.
THE BIGGEST THREAT TO AMERICAS SECURITY IS THE CORPORATE ENTITY AND PERSONHOOD. A FACELESS ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE WHICH IS BECOMING BIGGER THAN GOVERNMENT ITSELF. IT HAS NO CONTROLS AND UNLIMITED RESOURCES AND MONEY. CORPORATIONS ARE THE NEW WORLD ORDER. NEARLY 70% OF ALL STATE UTILITIES ARE PRIVATIZED. ROADS ARE PRIVATIZED. SOON THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE PRIVATIZED AND SOLD TO CORPORATIONS WHERE PEOPLE WILL NOT HAVE VOICE, LIKE THE FEUDALISM OF THE MIDDLE AGES. THEY CONTROL OUR FOOD PRODUCTION, OUR HEALTH, AND THE WATER WE DRINK. THEY ARE EVEN TRYING TO TAX HUMANS ON OUR CO2 EMISSIONS. MOST NATION STATES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR ASSETS IN THE NAME OF COMPETITION, PRIVATIZATION, RESTRUCTURING, THE WTO, THE IMF, AND THE WORLD BANK.
IT MAY BE PRETTY MUCH OVER FOR AMERICA. GET USE TO IT. LEARN TO BE A HAPPY COMMUNIST CAMPER EATING YOUR NODDLES, AND LIVING IN A TENT CITY, COURTESY OF THE CHINESE RED CROSS.
A five minute video by Lou Dobbs
Bin Laden is Dead - Killed by Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh
Benazir Bhutto, who was killed in a suicide attack at the end of 2007 stated in November that the Osama bin Laden, the head of the international terrorist network al-Qaida, had been killed.
Bhutto claimed that she even knew the man who had killed the prime suspect of 9/11 terrorist attacks in the USA.
According to Bhutto’s words, Bin Laden was killed by Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh – one of those convicted of kidnapping and killing U.S. journalist Daniel Pearl.
Bhutto released that statement on November 2, 2007 in an interview with Al-Jazeera TV channel. Bhutto spoke in English in the program titled Frost Over the World. However, no one paid any attention to her words. Speaking about the enemies, who did not wish to see her back in Pakistan, she said: “Omar Sheikh is the man who murdered Osama bin Laden.”
The video of Bhutto’s interview to Al-Jazeera can be found on YouTube (click to see the video). The assassinated Pakistani prime minister says the words about Bin Laden’s killer during the second minute of the interview. She stays absolutely calm when she pronounces the names. More than 600,000 people have already viewed the video.
Correspondent David Frost, who interview Bhutto, did not even care to ask more questions about the sensational statement. Frost, who is believed to be an experienced journalist, did not even ask Bhutto when Bin Laden was killed.
Benazir Bhutto’s interview to Al-Jazeera received very little attention from the media. There was practically no newspaper in the world who published the news on its front page, although tens of thousands of people discussed the news for two months. It just so happens that even Al-Jazeera messed it up.
There was no official who commented on the information. Not a word was said from the CIA and the FBI. They did not even lift a finger to reject it. Absolute silence. But the U.S. administration promised a reward of 25 million dollars for Bin Laden’s body, dead or alive.
Benazir Bhutto is now dead. She cannot say anything about her sources of information
Source: Pravda Ru
Bhutto claimed that she even knew the man who had killed the prime suspect of 9/11 terrorist attacks in the USA.
According to Bhutto’s words, Bin Laden was killed by Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh – one of those convicted of kidnapping and killing U.S. journalist Daniel Pearl.
Bhutto released that statement on November 2, 2007 in an interview with Al-Jazeera TV channel. Bhutto spoke in English in the program titled Frost Over the World. However, no one paid any attention to her words. Speaking about the enemies, who did not wish to see her back in Pakistan, she said: “Omar Sheikh is the man who murdered Osama bin Laden.”
The video of Bhutto’s interview to Al-Jazeera can be found on YouTube (click to see the video). The assassinated Pakistani prime minister says the words about Bin Laden’s killer during the second minute of the interview. She stays absolutely calm when she pronounces the names. More than 600,000 people have already viewed the video.
Correspondent David Frost, who interview Bhutto, did not even care to ask more questions about the sensational statement. Frost, who is believed to be an experienced journalist, did not even ask Bhutto when Bin Laden was killed.
Benazir Bhutto’s interview to Al-Jazeera received very little attention from the media. There was practically no newspaper in the world who published the news on its front page, although tens of thousands of people discussed the news for two months. It just so happens that even Al-Jazeera messed it up.
There was no official who commented on the information. Not a word was said from the CIA and the FBI. They did not even lift a finger to reject it. Absolute silence. But the U.S. administration promised a reward of 25 million dollars for Bin Laden’s body, dead or alive.
Benazir Bhutto is now dead. She cannot say anything about her sources of information
Source: Pravda Ru
Recreational Drugs FAR Less Likely to Kill You than Prescribed Drugs!
By Christopher Kent, D.C., J.D.
Recreational drugs, including cocaine and heroin, are responsible for an estimated 10,000-20,000 American deaths per year [1,2]. While this represents a serious public health problem, it is a "smokescreen" for America's real drug problem. America's "war on drugs" is directed at the wrong enemy. It is obvious that interdiction, stiff mandatory sentences, and more vigorous enforcement of drug laws have failed.
The reason is simple. Cause and effect have been reversed.
The desire to solve problems by taking drugs is a product of our culture. When a child is taught by loving parents that the appropriate response to pain or discomfort is taking a pill, it is obvious that such a child, when faced with the challenges of adolescence, will seek comfort by taking drugs.
Drugs are Dangerous Whether Pushed or Prescribed
While approximately 10,000 per year die from the effects of illegal drugs, an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported that an estimated 106,000 hospitalized patients die each year from drugs which, by medical standards, are properly prescribed and properly administered. More than two million suffer serious side effects. [3]
An article in Newsweek [4] put this into perspective. Adverse drug reactions, from "properly" prescribed drugs, are the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. According to this article, only heart disease, cancer, and stroke kill more Americans than drugs prescribed by medical doctors. Reactions to prescription drugs kill more than twice as many Americans as HIV/AIDS or suicide. Fewer die from accidents or diabetes than adverse drug reactions. It is important to point out the limitations of this study. It did not include outpatients, cases of malpractice, or instances where the drugs were not taken as directed.
According to another AMA publication, drug related "problems" kill as many as 198,815 people, put 8.8 million in hospitals, and account for up to 28% of hospital admissions. [5] If these figures are accurate, only cancer and heart disease kill more patients than drugs. Has the situation improved since the publication of this information? Hardly. Null [6] et al have published the most comprehensive and well-documented study I have seen of deaths associated with medical practice. In this report, their research revealed some shocking facts. The findings are summarized in the abstract:
"A definitive review and close reading of medical peer-review journals, and government health statistics shows that American medicine frequently causes more harm than good. The number of people having in-hospital, adverse drug reactions (ADR) to prescribed medicine is 2.2 million. Dr. Richard Besser, of the CDC, in 1995, said the number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually for viral infections was 20 million. Dr. Besser, in 2003, now refers to tens of millions of unnecessary antibiotics.
The number of unnecessary medical and surgical procedures performed annually is 7.5 million. The number of people exposed to unnecessary hospitalization annually is 8.9 million. The total number of iatrogenic deaths shown in the following table is 783,936. It is evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the United States. The 2001 heart disease annual death rate is 699,697; the annual cancer death rate, 553,251."
Drugs Number One Killer
The authors conclude: "When the number one killer in a society is the healthcare system, then, that system has no excuse except to address its own urgent shortcomings. It's a failed system in need of immediate attention. What we have outlined in this paper are insupportable aspects of our contemporary medical system that need to be changed -- beginning at its very foundations."
A recent article in Archives of Internal Medicine [7] stated that in the seven year period from 1998 through 2005, reported serious adverse drug events increased 2.6-fold, and fatal adverse drug events increased 2.7-fold. The authors noted that reported serious events increased 4 times faster than the total number of outpatient prescriptions during the period. Another study concluded that the majority(86%) of the adverse drug reactions for which patients were admitted to a medical intensive care unit were preventable. [8]
One proposed solution to the illegal drug problem was encouraging potential users to ignore peer pressure and "just say no." Interestingly, this strategy is not being recommended for prescription drugs. Bruce Pomeranz, MD , one of the authors of the JAMA paper, said he is not warning people to stay away from drugs. "That would be a terrible message," he said. Lucian Leape, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health said, "When you realize how many drugs we use, maybe those numbers aren't so bad after all." [4]
Does that mean that the number of deaths due to illegal drugs, suicide, HIV/AIDS, diabetes, accidents, and drunk driving "aren't so bad" either? Does it mean that we shouldn't discourage drunk driving or unsafe sex?
The folly of such double standards should be obvious to all. It is time to address the real drug problem -- the cultural notion that the first solution to seek for relief of life's problems is a drug. That's the drug culture we need to address.
References
"Drug deaths." Globe & Mail (Canada). February 27, 1998.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. CDC. 2007;56(05):93-96.
Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN: "Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients." JAMA 1998;279:1200.
Kalb C: "When drugs do harm." Newsweek. April 27, 1998. Page 61.
"Reaction." American Medical News. January 15, 1996. Page 11.
1. Null G, Dean C, Feldman, M, Rasio, D, Smith D: "Death by Medicine." Life Extension. March, 2004. www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm
Moore TJ, Cohen MR, Furberg CD: Serious adverse drug events reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998-2005. Archives of Internal Medicine 2007;167:1752-1759.
8. Rivkin A: Admissions to a medical intensive care unit related to adverse drug reactions. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 2007;64(17):1840-1843.
Recreational drugs, including cocaine and heroin, are responsible for an estimated 10,000-20,000 American deaths per year [1,2]. While this represents a serious public health problem, it is a "smokescreen" for America's real drug problem. America's "war on drugs" is directed at the wrong enemy. It is obvious that interdiction, stiff mandatory sentences, and more vigorous enforcement of drug laws have failed.
The reason is simple. Cause and effect have been reversed.
The desire to solve problems by taking drugs is a product of our culture. When a child is taught by loving parents that the appropriate response to pain or discomfort is taking a pill, it is obvious that such a child, when faced with the challenges of adolescence, will seek comfort by taking drugs.
Drugs are Dangerous Whether Pushed or Prescribed
While approximately 10,000 per year die from the effects of illegal drugs, an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported that an estimated 106,000 hospitalized patients die each year from drugs which, by medical standards, are properly prescribed and properly administered. More than two million suffer serious side effects. [3]
An article in Newsweek [4] put this into perspective. Adverse drug reactions, from "properly" prescribed drugs, are the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. According to this article, only heart disease, cancer, and stroke kill more Americans than drugs prescribed by medical doctors. Reactions to prescription drugs kill more than twice as many Americans as HIV/AIDS or suicide. Fewer die from accidents or diabetes than adverse drug reactions. It is important to point out the limitations of this study. It did not include outpatients, cases of malpractice, or instances where the drugs were not taken as directed.
According to another AMA publication, drug related "problems" kill as many as 198,815 people, put 8.8 million in hospitals, and account for up to 28% of hospital admissions. [5] If these figures are accurate, only cancer and heart disease kill more patients than drugs. Has the situation improved since the publication of this information? Hardly. Null [6] et al have published the most comprehensive and well-documented study I have seen of deaths associated with medical practice. In this report, their research revealed some shocking facts. The findings are summarized in the abstract:
"A definitive review and close reading of medical peer-review journals, and government health statistics shows that American medicine frequently causes more harm than good. The number of people having in-hospital, adverse drug reactions (ADR) to prescribed medicine is 2.2 million. Dr. Richard Besser, of the CDC, in 1995, said the number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually for viral infections was 20 million. Dr. Besser, in 2003, now refers to tens of millions of unnecessary antibiotics.
The number of unnecessary medical and surgical procedures performed annually is 7.5 million. The number of people exposed to unnecessary hospitalization annually is 8.9 million. The total number of iatrogenic deaths shown in the following table is 783,936. It is evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the United States. The 2001 heart disease annual death rate is 699,697; the annual cancer death rate, 553,251."
Drugs Number One Killer
The authors conclude: "When the number one killer in a society is the healthcare system, then, that system has no excuse except to address its own urgent shortcomings. It's a failed system in need of immediate attention. What we have outlined in this paper are insupportable aspects of our contemporary medical system that need to be changed -- beginning at its very foundations."
A recent article in Archives of Internal Medicine [7] stated that in the seven year period from 1998 through 2005, reported serious adverse drug events increased 2.6-fold, and fatal adverse drug events increased 2.7-fold. The authors noted that reported serious events increased 4 times faster than the total number of outpatient prescriptions during the period. Another study concluded that the majority(86%) of the adverse drug reactions for which patients were admitted to a medical intensive care unit were preventable. [8]
One proposed solution to the illegal drug problem was encouraging potential users to ignore peer pressure and "just say no." Interestingly, this strategy is not being recommended for prescription drugs. Bruce Pomeranz, MD , one of the authors of the JAMA paper, said he is not warning people to stay away from drugs. "That would be a terrible message," he said. Lucian Leape, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health said, "When you realize how many drugs we use, maybe those numbers aren't so bad after all." [4]
Does that mean that the number of deaths due to illegal drugs, suicide, HIV/AIDS, diabetes, accidents, and drunk driving "aren't so bad" either? Does it mean that we shouldn't discourage drunk driving or unsafe sex?
The folly of such double standards should be obvious to all. It is time to address the real drug problem -- the cultural notion that the first solution to seek for relief of life's problems is a drug. That's the drug culture we need to address.
References
"Drug deaths." Globe & Mail (Canada). February 27, 1998.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. CDC. 2007;56(05):93-96.
Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN: "Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients." JAMA 1998;279:1200.
Kalb C: "When drugs do harm." Newsweek. April 27, 1998. Page 61.
"Reaction." American Medical News. January 15, 1996. Page 11.
1. Null G, Dean C, Feldman, M, Rasio, D, Smith D: "Death by Medicine." Life Extension. March, 2004. www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm
Moore TJ, Cohen MR, Furberg CD: Serious adverse drug events reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998-2005. Archives of Internal Medicine 2007;167:1752-1759.
8. Rivkin A: Admissions to a medical intensive care unit related to adverse drug reactions. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 2007;64(17):1840-1843.
Sunday, 13 January 2008
European Media edict: 'Make sure Ron Paul does not exist"
By Marcus Salek,
After monitoring the newspapers in Europe for the last several months and finding nothing mentioned about Ron Paul, I can not help but think that a media edict has gone out to ensure no one ever hears about him in Europe -- at least not in the main stream press.
A case in point is today's article in the Independent. It is the only time I have ever seen his name mentioned as a viable candidate. Here is a quote from an article from the Independent entitled "US president: The great $2bn vote race" :
"This is especially important for those courting younger voters – most of the Democrats and the libertarian anti-war Republican Ron Paul. As Mr Paul has shown, a handful of staff can energise hundreds of volunteers to go forth and multiply the number of times he pops up on sites such as YouTube or in political blogs. His Internet fund-raising has been so successful, and his outgoings so low, that Mr Paul has at times had more cash on hand than veteran Senator John McCain and other frontrunner's" http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article3331797.ece
"Hundreds of volunteers to multiply the number of times he pops up on sites such as YouTube" ?? "Outgoings so low"? With 10% of the vote? No mention of vote fraud and the recount. What about the thousands that sent him contributions? Last month the Independent said that spamers from the Ukraine send out millions of emails supporting Ron Paul which would make him look popular. One has to wonder who writes this crap?
After monitoring the newspapers in Europe for the last several months and finding nothing mentioned about Ron Paul, I can not help but think that a media edict has gone out to ensure no one ever hears about him in Europe -- at least not in the main stream press.
A case in point is today's article in the Independent. It is the only time I have ever seen his name mentioned as a viable candidate. Here is a quote from an article from the Independent entitled "US president: The great $2bn vote race" :
"This is especially important for those courting younger voters – most of the Democrats and the libertarian anti-war Republican Ron Paul. As Mr Paul has shown, a handful of staff can energise hundreds of volunteers to go forth and multiply the number of times he pops up on sites such as YouTube or in political blogs. His Internet fund-raising has been so successful, and his outgoings so low, that Mr Paul has at times had more cash on hand than veteran Senator John McCain and other frontrunner's" http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article3331797.ece
"Hundreds of volunteers to multiply the number of times he pops up on sites such as YouTube" ?? "Outgoings so low"? With 10% of the vote? No mention of vote fraud and the recount. What about the thousands that sent him contributions? Last month the Independent said that spamers from the Ukraine send out millions of emails supporting Ron Paul which would make him look popular. One has to wonder who writes this crap?
-
With these messages embedded in peoples sub-conscious, Ron Paul is automatically discounted in the minds of the European public. After all, the UK is the home of the Rothschild's Bank of England, and the most Zionist infiltrated government and media outside of Israel. A person running for office in ANY country in Europe who is not dedicated to the service of Israel is either discounted or ruined in the mainstream press.
This is the trash that is being printed in the mainstream media in Europe. They are more of afraid of Ron Paul in Brussels than in the United States. Why? Because the EU is the most totalitarian regime ever created since the Soviet Union. They can't have anyone believing in personal liberty. It will spoil their plans of chipping everyone. Europe is much further ahead in the plan for One World Government than America. They have had years of practice forming the Soviet EU and restricting freedom of speech. Just today the Independent announced that the UK government wants to put RFID chips in prisoners and pedophiles to track them.
This is the trash that is being printed in the mainstream media in Europe. They are more of afraid of Ron Paul in Brussels than in the United States. Why? Because the EU is the most totalitarian regime ever created since the Soviet Union. They can't have anyone believing in personal liberty. It will spoil their plans of chipping everyone. Europe is much further ahead in the plan for One World Government than America. They have had years of practice forming the Soviet EU and restricting freedom of speech. Just today the Independent announced that the UK government wants to put RFID chips in prisoners and pedophiles to track them.
(see "A former communist speaks about the European Union: http://www.nwo101.com/2007/09/european-union-new-soviet.html)
Saturday, 12 January 2008
Starbuck Corporation vs Russian Orthodox monk Father Tryphon
Starbucks has trademarked "Christmas Blend" and it belongs to them and no one else can use it to make money. Christs Birthday Blend would probably be a better choise unless, of course, Starbucks decides to trademark it just in case!
Corporate Greed: Comparing Billionaire Henry Kravis lifestyle to four average Americans
Henry Kravis is founding partner of KKR, a private equity corporation that contributes absolutely nothing to American society except cutting jobs and paying almost no taxes. Equity firms contribute nothing. They earn profits from manipulating money. They produce nothing. http://warongreed.org/
Another reason for the regulation and control of corporate size. They must be regulated. It is not capitalism. Its fascism and that is why America fought World War II and Mussolini.
Merck Engaged in Blatant Scientific Fraud with Vytorin Cholesterol Study? (opinion)
This is an indication of just how completely drug companies have abandoned anything resembling the Scientific Method and are now just making up the science as they go along. It's sort of like listening to the Bush Administration talk about global warming: They just make up whatever goofy logic sounds good for the moment, and then declare that to be "scientifically sound." It's science by declaration!More importantly, the only reason these drug companies have to keep fudging the data like this is because their drugs don't work! If the drug was any good, they wouldn't have to cherry pick the data, would they? The fact that this kind of scientific nonsense is taking place tells you just how shabby the data are in the first place.
Merck Engaged in Blatant Scientific Fraud with Vytorin Cholesterol Study? (opinion)
Merck Engaged in Blatant Scientific Fraud with Vytorin Cholesterol Study? (opinion)
Friday, 11 January 2008
Russia to have 50 silo-based Topol-M ICBM systems by end of 2008
By Marcus Salek, PragueMOSCOW, January 10 (RIA Novosti) - Russia will fully equip a fifth strategic missile regiment with new silo-based intercontinental ballistic missiles in 2008, a spokesman for the Strategic Missile Forces (SMF) said on Thursday.
At present, Russia operates 48 Topol-M systems (NATO reporting name SS-27) and will deploy another two with a missile regiment in the Saratov Region in southern Russia this year, bringing the total number to 50.
"Rearmament of the Tatishchevo missile regiment with two silo-based Topol-M systems will be completed in 2008," Colonel Alexander Vovk said, adding that each regiment has 10 missile complexes.
The missile, with a range of about 7,000 miles (11,000 kms), is said to be immune to any current and future U.S. ABM defense. It is capable of making evasive maneuvers to avoid a kill by the use of terminal phase interceptors, and carries targeting countermeasures and decoys.
It is also shielded against radiation, electromagnetic pulse, nuclear blasts at distances more than 500 meters (1,650 feet) away, and is designed to survive a hit from any form of laser technology.
Gen. Nikolai Solovtsov, SMF commander, earlier said that Topol-M systems would be equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV) in the next two or three years.
I am glad I cancelled my contract to buy a new flat in Prague. I don't want to be near the city when the US starts to attack Russia and Russia distroys our radar bases. M. Salek
Thursday, 10 January 2008
Medicine: The Toxic Plague
"Perhaps most important, we must no longer allow the deadly triad of the medical, pharmaceutical and chemical giants to pretend that the beginnings of an environmental plague are all in our heads, a pretense that allows them to get away with murder."
By: Lynne McTaggart: http://www.wddty.com/03363800369307955587/the-toxic-plague.html
Toxic chemicals are to us now what viruses were a century ago the hidden enemy and the source of much illness. In our everyday life we are now so immersed in chemicals at last count there were 70,000 of them out there that most of the latest syndrome
There is now sick building syndrome, wood preservative syndrome, solvent intolerance, chemically associated immune dysfunction, Gulf War syndrome, not to mention the more obtuse appellations like ecological disease, clinical ecology syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and, our latest, multiple chemical sensitivity all hinting at an environmental cause.
Despite increasing evidence that chemicals are making many people ill, the medical establishment stubbornly hangs on to microbes as the one and only only source of illness, considering any other problem the stuff of the sufferer's fevered imagination. This was the conclusion of the 1996 Royal College's Report on chronic fatigue syndrome and on MCS problems, Nevertheless, the editor of the Lancet, Dr Richard Horton, took a brave step forward by arguing: "Somehow I cannot accept that pesticides, sprays and gases are the harmless accoutrements of today's life. But how do we prove it one way or the other?"
Although some good scientific studies have already proved that some people are hypersensitive to chemicals (see main story this month), the crux of the problem is really finding out exactly how these chemicals damage us which of our chemical pathways they disturb.
There is no way to determine, for instance, if a single chemical disrupts hormones, say, simply by examining its molecular make up. You have to subject it to a battery of tests, which, incidentally, have yet to be devised. Just consider, for a moment, the prospect of testing 70,000 chemicals, one by one.
An even more mountainous problem concerns the effect of these substances in tandem. We now know that the combined effect of two or three pesticides at low levels as might be found in most ordinary modern environments magnifies by up to 1600 times the effect of any insecticide by itself. So that means it makes sense to test these chemicals in combination. But as Rachel's Environment & Health Weekly pointed out (13 June, 1996): "To test just the commonest 1000 toxic chemicals in unique combinations of three would require at least 166 million different experiments (and this disregards the need to study varying doses).
"Even if each experiment took just one hour to complete and 100 laboratories worked round the clock seven days a week, testing all possible unique three-way combinations of 1000 chemicals would still take over 180 years to complete."
That staggering notion requires all of us to shout a little louder at the chemical industry. At the moment, most chemicals are innocent until proven guilty.
Consumers must demand that far fewer chemicals be used, and only those about which most is known; that pesticides be employed only for emergencies; and that manufacturers have the burden of proof, to prove a chemical is safe before it can be circulated.
Perhaps most important, we must no longer allow the deadly triad of the medical, pharmaceutical and chemical giants to pretend that the beginnings of an environmental plague are all in our heads, a pretense that allows them to get away with murder.
Agent Orange had disastrous effects: (warning, pictures may be disturbing) http://www.greenleft.org.au/2005/644/33720
By: Lynne McTaggart: http://www.wddty.com/03363800369307955587/the-toxic-plague.html
Toxic chemicals are to us now what viruses were a century ago the hidden enemy and the source of much illness. In our everyday life we are now so immersed in chemicals at last count there were 70,000 of them out there that most of the latest syndrome
There is now sick building syndrome, wood preservative syndrome, solvent intolerance, chemically associated immune dysfunction, Gulf War syndrome, not to mention the more obtuse appellations like ecological disease, clinical ecology syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and, our latest, multiple chemical sensitivity all hinting at an environmental cause.
Despite increasing evidence that chemicals are making many people ill, the medical establishment stubbornly hangs on to microbes as the one and only only source of illness, considering any other problem the stuff of the sufferer's fevered imagination. This was the conclusion of the 1996 Royal College's Report on chronic fatigue syndrome and on MCS problems, Nevertheless, the editor of the Lancet, Dr Richard Horton, took a brave step forward by arguing: "Somehow I cannot accept that pesticides, sprays and gases are the harmless accoutrements of today's life. But how do we prove it one way or the other?"
Although some good scientific studies have already proved that some people are hypersensitive to chemicals (see main story this month), the crux of the problem is really finding out exactly how these chemicals damage us which of our chemical pathways they disturb.
There is no way to determine, for instance, if a single chemical disrupts hormones, say, simply by examining its molecular make up. You have to subject it to a battery of tests, which, incidentally, have yet to be devised. Just consider, for a moment, the prospect of testing 70,000 chemicals, one by one.
An even more mountainous problem concerns the effect of these substances in tandem. We now know that the combined effect of two or three pesticides at low levels as might be found in most ordinary modern environments magnifies by up to 1600 times the effect of any insecticide by itself. So that means it makes sense to test these chemicals in combination. But as Rachel's Environment & Health Weekly pointed out (13 June, 1996): "To test just the commonest 1000 toxic chemicals in unique combinations of three would require at least 166 million different experiments (and this disregards the need to study varying doses).
"Even if each experiment took just one hour to complete and 100 laboratories worked round the clock seven days a week, testing all possible unique three-way combinations of 1000 chemicals would still take over 180 years to complete."
That staggering notion requires all of us to shout a little louder at the chemical industry. At the moment, most chemicals are innocent until proven guilty.
Consumers must demand that far fewer chemicals be used, and only those about which most is known; that pesticides be employed only for emergencies; and that manufacturers have the burden of proof, to prove a chemical is safe before it can be circulated.
Perhaps most important, we must no longer allow the deadly triad of the medical, pharmaceutical and chemical giants to pretend that the beginnings of an environmental plague are all in our heads, a pretense that allows them to get away with murder.
Agent Orange had disastrous effects: (warning, pictures may be disturbing) http://www.greenleft.org.au/2005/644/33720
Is Nazi medicine back? Pfizer sued for testing experimental drugs on African children.
Drug Trials: Drug co accused of using critically ill children as ‘guinea pigs’
10 January 2008
By Marcus Salek
Pfizer are back in the dock again, this time for testing an experimental drug on children during a deadly meningitis outbreak. The drug giant faces a fine of $9bn (£.4.5bn) if it is found guilty of the charge.
The case centres on the unlicensed drug trovafloxacin which was supposedly given to a group of children in 1996 in Kano, Nigeria. Five of the children subsequently died.
The illegal use of the drug came to light in 2006 when the story appeared in the Washington Post.
A Nigerian court has issued arrest warrants for three Pfizer executives in Nigeria after they failed to appear in court to face charges from the Nigerian government that they used critically ill children as ‘guinea pigs’ in an illegal drug trial.
Pfizer denies all charges.
(Source: British Medical Journal, 2008; 336: 11).
10 January 2008
By Marcus Salek
Pfizer are back in the dock again, this time for testing an experimental drug on children during a deadly meningitis outbreak. The drug giant faces a fine of $9bn (£.4.5bn) if it is found guilty of the charge.
The case centres on the unlicensed drug trovafloxacin which was supposedly given to a group of children in 1996 in Kano, Nigeria. Five of the children subsequently died.
The illegal use of the drug came to light in 2006 when the story appeared in the Washington Post.
A Nigerian court has issued arrest warrants for three Pfizer executives in Nigeria after they failed to appear in court to face charges from the Nigerian government that they used critically ill children as ‘guinea pigs’ in an illegal drug trial.
Pfizer denies all charges.
(Source: British Medical Journal, 2008; 336: 11).
Wednesday, 9 January 2008
The blatant dismissal of consumers' concerns regarding genetically modified foods
There can surely be little doubt that consumers are overwhelmingly opposed to eating genetically modified foods. Time and again, surveys and polls in countries throughout the world have proven this beyond any reasonable doubt. Nevertheless, the fact that genetically modified seeds can be patented – because, unlike regular seeds, they are created in laboratories and do not exist in nature – continues to make them a highly attractive investment proposition to the biotech and pharmaceutical companies that produce them. Patents on genetically modified seeds, and the multi-billion dollar potential profits and market control that may result from them, are acting as powerful incentives for these manufacturers to find ways of forcing such foods onto consumers' dinner plates, regardless of the possible dangers to human health.Notably, therefore, this year's meeting of the Committee was attended by Dr. H. Yoshikura, the Chairman of the Codex Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology, a group that has already produced several global guidelines on genetically modified foods. The Task Force's creation of these guidelines subsequently became instrumental in the United States, Canada and Argentina launching, and winning, a trade dispute at the World Trade Organization against the European Union (EU), where they successfully argued that the EU had been applying a moratorium on the approval and importation of foods containing genetically modified material and that this was contrary to WTO rules.
Yoshikura had been invited to attend this Codex meeting because the Task Force has recently been working on an annex to a global guideline for foods that have been genetically modified to (supposedly) provide nutritional or health benefits. Because the text of this annex contains references to concepts related to nutrition, the Committee was invited to review the draft annex and to provide comments on it.
Aside from making a few minor comments, however, the Committee decided to endorse the text of the annex without making any changes to it whatsoever.
In response to this, and noting that not one single country had spoken out to defend the interests of consumers regarding this issue, the National Health Federation made the following statement:
Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, the Chairman of the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses, claims that consumers do not realise the benefits of genetically modified foods and that they will in time change their minds about them.
"Mr Chairman, the NHF would like to put on the record that while the issue of risk assessment of foods derived from biotechnology is being discussed, 95% of European consumers and millions of consumers from other parts of the world have continued to indicate their rejection of such foods. We would like to know therefore how the Task Force aims to balance the need to undertake exposure studies on representative human populations when so many people reject these foods outright?"
In other words, the Federation was asking how the Task Force was planning to carry out human safety studies of genetically modified foods when so few people are prepared to eat them.
The Committee's Chairman, Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, gave a breathtakingly dismissive response to this question and, unwilling to admit that comprehensive human exposure studies would not be carried out before these foods are marketed, he stated that these aspects could not be discussed at this meeting. Astonishingly, however, he then went on to claim that consumers do not realise the benefits that these foods provide and that he believes consumers will in time change their minds about them.
Later, at the end of the week, during the meeting to adopt the Committee's official report, I requested, on behalf of the National Health Federation, that the report should make mention of the Federation's statement regarding this matter. Dr. Grossklaus refused to allow this however, arguing that the issue was not discussed and that including mention of all issues that were not discussed would make the report too long.
All in all, therefore, this was arguably the most blatant example of the concerns of consumers being dismissed in a Codex meeting that I have ever witnessed. - Dr. Rath foundation
-
-
A breakthrough study from a national Russian research agency suggests that a diet with genetically-modified (GM) soy may indeed affect newborns of parents maintaining a GM-based food diet. According to the study reported by Russian federal news agency. http://www.biotech-weblog.com/50226711/genetically_modified_soy_in_russia.phpMisreporting Kosovo - Germanys role in the Yugoslavian war
Source www.Trumpet.com
How the mainstream press has missed the single most important angle to what’s happening in Kosovo.
Brad Macdonald On back-to-back days in December 1991, the New York Times published two separate articles highlighting Germany’s alarming and audacious decision to recognize and legitimize the efforts of Slovenia and Croatia to break away from Yugoslavia. Both articles (you can read them here and here) are refreshingly honest and hold little back in their analysis of Germany’s seminal role in the violent fragmentation of Yugoslavia.
In this article, Paul Lewis cites European diplomats who warned that Germany’s decision to support Croatia and Slovenia, despite opposition from virtually the rest of the world, “underscored Germany’s growing political power in the 12-nation European Community.” Germany’s incursion into the Balkans, wrote Lewis, “has worried many in Europe who see it as an attempt to re-exert traditional Germanic influences over this area of the Balkans” (emphasis mine throughout).
Lewis exhibited little reticence in exposing the German undercurrent gushing beneath what was unfolding in Yugoslavia, even when it meant connecting Germany’s decision to recognize Croatia and Slovenia in 1991, to its sordid history with these entities during World War ii.
Moreover, in its unusual assertiveness in moving ahead with a plan to extend diplomatic recognition to the breakaway Yugoslav republics of Croatia and Slovenia, Germany has stirred troubling historical associations …. Nazi Germany dominated the two Yugoslav regions during World War ii, absorbing Slovenia into the Third Reich and creating a puppet regime in Croatia.
Then there’s this piece from the Times a month later: “Germany’s decision to press for quick recognition of the two republics, disregarding appeals from the United States and the United Nations, marked a new assertiveness that some Europeans find disconcerting” (Jan. 16, 1992).
The point?
In 1991-92, a mainstream news organ like the New York Times was not afraid to confront the reality that Germany was manipulating the Balkans in an effort to “re-exert traditional Germanic influences” over the region. A willingness to analyze the Balkans through the German prism was plainly evident.
How times have changed.
On Monday, the deadline for a mutual solution to the Kosovo dilemma expired, and Kosovar Albanians, led by former terrorist leader Hashim Thaci, said they would immediately start finalizing their declaration of independence from Serbia, which they will likely announce within the first two months of 2008.
The subject of Kosovo’s independence does not lack coverage. What it lacks is the kind of fresh, up-front, in-depth reporting practiced by the likes of the New York Times when it covered Yugoslavia’s dissolution in 1991-92. When Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia broke away from Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, the Times didn’t hesitate to declare Germany’s pivotal and alarming role in the crises (though later, when the U.S. and British governments switched sides, so too did the Times).
Now Kosovo is about to erupt, and few people, certainly not the mainstream press, are talking about Germany’s fundamental role in this crisis!
Why not? It’s a blockbuster angle!
What’s happening in Kosovo is covered with German fingerprints. It was Germany (and the Vatican) that first legitimized the dissolution of the state formerly called Yugoslavia. The day Bonn threw its weight behind Croatia’s and Slovenia’s decision to break away in 1991, every republic in Yugoslavia that was thinking about breaking away, including Kosovo, learned that it could do so and have the support of Germany and the Vatican.
But Germany’s intimate relationship with Kosovo runs deeper than mere ideological support. The involvement in the province by Germany, one of Kosovo’s most important and long-standing supporters, has manifested itself in very practical—and dangerous—ways. The German government has been closely linked to the Kosovo Liberation Army (kla), a terrorist organization that during the early to mid-1990s was linked to the mafia in Kosovo and other Islamic terrorists in the region.
In 1996, the German foreign intelligence service (bnd), established a major outpost in the Albanian city of Tirana, where kla terrorists were trained to fight against Serbian authorities. According to Le Monde Diplomatique, “special forces in Berlin provided the operational training and supplied arms and transmission equipment from ex-East German Stasi stocks as well as black uniforms” (May 1999).
Here’s what Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry wrote in July 2002:
Kosovo’s “internationally unrecognized government-in-exile” had a prime minister who was based in Germany and operated freely with the blessing (perhaps even the direction) of the German government! So Germany recognized Kosovo’s government-in-exile when nobody else did. But the international community submissively followed Germany’s lead. The kla guerrillas didn’t just happen. They were essentially raised up and directly supported by Germany—the powerhouse of Europe.
How many analysts, when they consider Kosovo’s independence today, are factoring in Germany’s central role in the growth and expansion of the kla? How many wonder why Germany would be so interested in, and go to such great lengths to secure, Kosovo’s independence from Serbia? What’s in it for Germany?
These questions lie at the heart of analysis on Kosovo—but few are asking them!
The Trumpet has explained how, under the umbrella of the United States and nato, Germany and Europe have, since 1991, dramatically increased their influence in the Balkans. By employing a subtle diplomatic divide-and-conquer policy, Germany has precipitated the systematic and violent fracturing of Yugoslavia. It was Germany, through cunning use of exaggerated and inaccurate claims and emotive language, that in 1999 stirred nato, predominantly comprised of U.S. troops, to bomb Serbia.
In March 1999, German Defense Minister Rudolf Scharping said in a television interview on zdf that “genocide is starting” in Serbia. His alarmist vocabulary turned the collective Western mindset against Serbia. The Australian reported on April 1, 1999, “With thousands of refugees continuing to stream out of the war-torn province, German Defense Minister Rudolf Scharping claimed in Bonn last night that evidence had emerged of concentration camps being set up by Serb forces.”
“People watched television and saw the streams of Albanian refugees,” wrote Gerald Flurry at the time. “Then they totally blamed the Serbs. Most knew very little about Kosovo, yet spoke of ‘genocide’—the deliberate and systematic destruction of a race. Then came talk about ‘concentration camps.’ Genocide and concentration camps—words introduced by the German defense minister” (The Rising Beast).
Are Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic’s supposed atrocities against Albanians the real reason America and nato bombed Belgrade into submission? During the 1990s, actual genocides were occurring in Rwanda and Sierra Leone—not to mention the slaughter of Serbs by Croatians and the Kosovo Albanians themselves—and the Clinton government did little to intervene. Why was America prepared to bomb Serbia into submission, but not the evil forces killing hundreds of thousands of innocent victims in Rwanda or Sierra Leone? Because America was pressured into bombing Serbia! Germany and Europe convinced all of nato to fight for their Balkan cause!
From the very beginning, Germany and Europe have been determined to conquer the Balkans, be it by force or in a web of diplomatic maneuvers.
Whether or not it is true, as Václav Havel famously claimed, that NATO's attack on Yugoslavia represents the first war to be waged "in the name of principles and values," the first "ethical war,"
In 2003, EU Commission President Romano Prodi promised that all Balkan countries—if they danced to the EU’s tune of course—could “become members of the EU one day.” While they might not necessarily become members on the same day, and each would have to follow its own course, he said, nonetheless, “in the long run, [the] Balkans belong strictly to the EU” (EUobserver, Jan. 10, 2003).
Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks!
This is why Germany wanted Serbia, its historical enemy and counterweight in the region, destroyed by nato. Germany and Europe believe the Balkans belong “strictly to the EU.” Without the pesky Slobodan Milosevic around to interrupt their plans, Germany and Europe could more easily conquer the Balkans!
Any in-depth analysis of the events unfolding in Kosovo must account for this history.
The International Herald Tribune reported yesterday on a plan concocted by Slovenia (which will likely be holding the EU presidency when Kosovo declares its independence) by which the European Union will embrace Kosovo when it declares statehood. Europe is prepping itself for action in Kosovo.
The Tribune quoted one diplomat who said that if violence breaks out in Kosovo, Europe’s response must be “fast and decisive because the EU is showing it’s boss in its own courtyard. We want to show we don’t need Washington or Moscow to tell us what to do.”
Considering the history we just covered, against whom do you think Germany and Europe will take action?
On Monday, the Itar-Tass news agency reported that Wolfgang Ischinger, the German diplomat representing the EU in the group of three international mediators (Russia, the United States and the EU) at the talks that were held between Serbia and Kosovar Albanians, told Radio Berlin Brandenburg that the EU would soon be in agreement on the Kosovo issue.
Ischinger’s interpretation of what Kosovo’s independence will look like was intriguing. “It will be a state entity,” he said, “which will continue to be under broad international observation. The nato troops will continue to be deployed there. A further international presence of the UN and, consequently, of EU, will be ensured.”
Germany and Europe are making plans to cement their control of Kosovo via the UN and nato!
In 1991, both Germany and Europe as a whole were significantly weaker, less unified and less defined than they are today. Germany was a newly united, largely inward-focused state in the early stages of resurrecting itself as the leader of Europe and on the global scene. Europe was even more amorphous than it appears today.
But this seemingly innocuous appearance didn’t stop a major newspaper from ringing alarm bells when Germany boldly announced it would support Croatia and Slovenia in their quest for independence, a decision that many knew would set a dangerous precedent and likely cause Yugoslavia’s dissolution. At that time, even a mainstream news source analyzed the breakdown of Yugoslavia in the context of German ambition in the Balkans!
Today, we don’t see any such analysis in the news media. Germany and the EU are widely embraced as legitimate and influential global powers with a formidable economic, military and geopolitical imprint. Europe, with Germany at its vanguard, has become a respected and increasingly powerful geopolitical force motivated by lofty ambitions of becoming a united superpower.
Still, the mainstream media today refuse to analyze the Balkans in the context of what’s happening in Germany and Europe, and of Germany’s history with the region. This is the most dangerous and ominous angle of the story, and the most underreported one!
In time, this shameful ignorance will prove to be an expensive mistake
In 2003, EU Commission President Romano Prodi promised that all Balkan countries—if they danced to the EU’s tune of course—could “become members of the EU one day.” While they might not necessarily become members on the same day, and each would have to follow its own course, he said, nonetheless, “in the long run, [the] Balkans belong strictly to the EU” (EUobserver, Jan. 10, 2003).
Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks!
This is why Germany wanted Serbia, its historical enemy and counterweight in the region, destroyed by nato. Germany and Europe believe the Balkans belong “strictly to the EU.” Without the pesky Slobodan Milosevic around to interrupt their plans, Germany and Europe could more easily conquer the Balkans!
Any in-depth analysis of the events unfolding in Kosovo must account for this history.
The International Herald Tribune reported yesterday on a plan concocted by Slovenia (which will likely be holding the EU presidency when Kosovo declares its independence) by which the European Union will embrace Kosovo when it declares statehood. Europe is prepping itself for action in Kosovo.
The Tribune quoted one diplomat who said that if violence breaks out in Kosovo, Europe’s response must be “fast and decisive because the EU is showing it’s boss in its own courtyard. We want to show we don’t need Washington or Moscow to tell us what to do.”
Considering the history we just covered, against whom do you think Germany and Europe will take action?
On Monday, the Itar-Tass news agency reported that Wolfgang Ischinger, the German diplomat representing the EU in the group of three international mediators (Russia, the United States and the EU) at the talks that were held between Serbia and Kosovar Albanians, told Radio Berlin Brandenburg that the EU would soon be in agreement on the Kosovo issue.
Ischinger’s interpretation of what Kosovo’s independence will look like was intriguing. “It will be a state entity,” he said, “which will continue to be under broad international observation. The nato troops will continue to be deployed there. A further international presence of the UN and, consequently, of EU, will be ensured.”
Germany and Europe are making plans to cement their control of Kosovo via the UN and nato!
In 1991, both Germany and Europe as a whole were significantly weaker, less unified and less defined than they are today. Germany was a newly united, largely inward-focused state in the early stages of resurrecting itself as the leader of Europe and on the global scene. Europe was even more amorphous than it appears today.
But this seemingly innocuous appearance didn’t stop a major newspaper from ringing alarm bells when Germany boldly announced it would support Croatia and Slovenia in their quest for independence, a decision that many knew would set a dangerous precedent and likely cause Yugoslavia’s dissolution. At that time, even a mainstream news source analyzed the breakdown of Yugoslavia in the context of German ambition in the Balkans!
Today, we don’t see any such analysis in the news media. Germany and the EU are widely embraced as legitimate and influential global powers with a formidable economic, military and geopolitical imprint. Europe, with Germany at its vanguard, has become a respected and increasingly powerful geopolitical force motivated by lofty ambitions of becoming a united superpower.
Still, the mainstream media today refuse to analyze the Balkans in the context of what’s happening in Germany and Europe, and of Germany’s history with the region. This is the most dangerous and ominous angle of the story, and the most underreported one!
In time, this shameful ignorance will prove to be an expensive mistake
Czech Republic continues sell off state assets to multinational corporations.
By Marcus Salek, Prague,
Prague- The Czech Industry and Trade Ministry will this year launch the privatisation of six state-owned testing institutes, minister Martin Riman told reporters in a article by ČTK news service.
He also wants to accelerate completion of the liquidation of the remaining 87 state-owned enterprises.
"The ministry has six testing institutes and we do not see any reason why they should not be privatised. They could then develop as fully-fledged private firms," said Riman.
He added that several state-owned research institutes were privatised successfully in the first half of the 1990s.
"The testing institutes, however, remained in state hands," Riman noted.
At the press conference, Riman also told reporters that the ministry was planning the exchange of 11 of its buildings in central Prague for a new building on the outskirts of the city where it move some 1,000 staff. Riman said the state budget could benefit from this transaction.
Prague- The Czech Industry and Trade Ministry will this year launch the privatisation of six state-owned testing institutes, minister Martin Riman told reporters in a article by ČTK news service.
He also wants to accelerate completion of the liquidation of the remaining 87 state-owned enterprises.
"The ministry has six testing institutes and we do not see any reason why they should not be privatised. They could then develop as fully-fledged private firms," said Riman.
He added that several state-owned research institutes were privatised successfully in the first half of the 1990s.
"The testing institutes, however, remained in state hands," Riman noted.
At the press conference, Riman also told reporters that the ministry was planning the exchange of 11 of its buildings in central Prague for a new building on the outskirts of the city where it move some 1,000 staff. Riman said the state budget could benefit from this transaction.
-
What a great concept! 18 years of Czech privatization would be better described as state asset stripping. Now the Czech Republic is under control of multinational corporations instead of the Czech citizens and their so called elected Representatives. The Multinational corporations have become the government!
-
The Czechs don't have a sovereign country anymore. What they have is a totalitarian government in Brussels, based on the Soviet model, and multinational corporations taking over control of all state enterprises, water, roads, sewage, electricity, gas, soon to be health care, for their personal gain and profit. Instead of the government serving the interests of the Czechs, the government leaders now serve the interests of the corporations. Mussolini called this Fascism or corporatism. He would be proud of his legacy if he were alive today.
-
The velvet takeover was simple. No wars of conquest.The global elite just put few of their professors in universities espousing Reagan/Thatcherism, where young naive students, now the Czech government, could assimilated the holy grail of free market economy. Their mantra was "State ownership is Communism! Private ownership is freedom"
-
In reality, true capitalism and competition can only exist if their are limits put on the size of corporations. This gives everyone the change to compete and insures no corporation can replace the state government in size a stature.
-
Why bother to have a government at all? Why not have the corporations elected their puppets directly. It would save everyone the trouble of voting.
-
Now, with state utilities and departments gone, and no additional income being generated for their services, the middle class will end up paying the taxes. The Czech Government, of course, will run out of money so they will need to restructure. Restructure is the code word for stripping away all social programs, and health care, and putting it into private hands so the can make a hugh profit.
-
This tried and true method of conquest has already been used in most countries in the world. And what is the result? Do people in Europe have a better life? Do Americans? Will the Czechs? You can fill in your answer here.____
Tuesday, 8 January 2008
Kucinich: Another bright star in Washington - Endorses Paul as a Republican running mate
In my opinion, a Paul-Kucinich or Kucinich-Paul ticket would bring hope and integrity back to America
AIDS research - the sham that it actually is: Part 1
By Marcus Salek, Prague
-
Turning over the discovery of a cure for AIDS to private "for profit" industry is a crime against humanity.
-
Like Cancer, a AIDS cure will never be found by western corporate medicine. Why find a cure when they can make $15,000 per year just to keep a person alive? A Corporations goal is to make a profit, not to cure illness. Private pharmaceutical companies can not be expected to find a cure for anything because they make so much money curing nothing. The have the AMA and other medical syndicates that block any alternative treatments and make sure that if any doctor uses methods not supplied by big farm, they loose their medical license.
-
For example I found this article recently by Ken Adachi:
-
"In the Fall of 1990, two medical researchers, Drs.William Lyman and Steven Kaali, working at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City made an important discovery. They found that they could inactivate the HIV virus by applying a low voltage direct current electrical potential with an extremely small current flow to AIDS infected blood in a test tube. Initially, they discovered this in the lab by inserting two platinum electrodes into a glass tube filled with HIV-1 (type 1) infected blood.
They applied a direct current to the electrodes and found that a current flow in the range of 50-100 microamperes (uA) produced the most effective results. Practically all of the HIV viral particles were adversely affected while normal blood cells remained unharmed. The viral particles were not directly destroyed by the electric current, but rather the outer protein coating of the virus was affected in such a way as to prevent the virus from producing reverse transcriptase, a necessary enzyme needed by the virus to invade human cells.
Reverse transcriptase allows the virus to enter a human T cell line (called CEM-SS) and commandeer the DNA reproduction machinery. After using the host cell to reproduce itself into thousands of new virii, the swollen host cell (now called syncytia or giant cell) will burst and spew the contents into the bloodstream or lymph system. This is how the virus spreads, but lacking reverse transcriptase, the HIV virus can't invade the host cell and it becomes vulnerable to destruction by the body's immune system. (The details of this experiment can be read from Kaali's patent application.)
A brief announcement of this discovery appeared in The Houston Post (Mar 20, 1991), then in Science News (Mar. 30, 1991 pg. 207) and later in Longevity magazine: (Dec.1992 pg. 14). Following their work in the Fall of 1990, Kaali and Lyman presented their findings at the First International Symposium on Combination Therapies (an AIDS conference) in Washington DC on March 14th, 1991. Kaali outlined two methods for treating an AIDS patient with this new therapy: One method involved removing a small amount of blood, electrifying it and then returning it to the patient's body. The second method involved sewing a miniature electrifying power supply along with two tiny electrodes directly into the lumen of an artery. For long term treatment, the mini electrifying unit needed to be removed and relocated to a new artery site after 30-45 days since scar tissue and calcification forming around the implant unit would lead to artery blockage. Kaali (along with co-inventor Peter Schwolsky) filed for a patent on this implantable electrifying device on Nov 16, 1990 and nine months later was granted patent #5,139,684 on August 18, 1992.
It's interesting to note two things here:
1. In order to obtain a patent from the United States Patent Office, Kaali and Schwolsky had to prove that the device works as claimed. Lacking solid proof, US patents are simply not granted.
2. Very often it takes years to obtain a patent, yet this patent was granted in only nine months; a further indication to me of the strength of their demonstrated claims
It's also interesting to note that other than the 3 publications mentioned above and the March '91 AIDS conference, nothing again appeared in print, radio, or TV about this important discovery as a potential treatment and cure for AIDS from Kaali and company. Most knowledgeable observers feel that Kaali and Lyman's discovery was intentionally suppressed following the March '91 AIDS conference presentation.
If AIDS research was on the level and not the sham that it actually is, this should have made front page news around the world. (Around 1999, I was contacted by a woman with AIDS who had managed to reach Dr. William Lyman over the phone. She asked him about his experiments with Kaali regarding blood electrification and if she could obtain the treatment through them. Lyman denied any knowledge of any AIDS treatment or cure. He said he never heard of Dr. Kaali and he had no idea what she was talking about concerning blood electrification and then hung up on her. What does that tell about the power of the people behind the suppression of this discovery?)" [end]
Ken Adachi, http://educate-yourself.org/cn/LymanKaalibiocompatibleHIV1996report18nov06.shtml
They applied a direct current to the electrodes and found that a current flow in the range of 50-100 microamperes (uA) produced the most effective results. Practically all of the HIV viral particles were adversely affected while normal blood cells remained unharmed. The viral particles were not directly destroyed by the electric current, but rather the outer protein coating of the virus was affected in such a way as to prevent the virus from producing reverse transcriptase, a necessary enzyme needed by the virus to invade human cells.
Reverse transcriptase allows the virus to enter a human T cell line (called CEM-SS) and commandeer the DNA reproduction machinery. After using the host cell to reproduce itself into thousands of new virii, the swollen host cell (now called syncytia or giant cell) will burst and spew the contents into the bloodstream or lymph system. This is how the virus spreads, but lacking reverse transcriptase, the HIV virus can't invade the host cell and it becomes vulnerable to destruction by the body's immune system. (The details of this experiment can be read from Kaali's patent application.)
A brief announcement of this discovery appeared in The Houston Post (Mar 20, 1991), then in Science News (Mar. 30, 1991 pg. 207) and later in Longevity magazine: (Dec.1992 pg. 14). Following their work in the Fall of 1990, Kaali and Lyman presented their findings at the First International Symposium on Combination Therapies (an AIDS conference) in Washington DC on March 14th, 1991. Kaali outlined two methods for treating an AIDS patient with this new therapy: One method involved removing a small amount of blood, electrifying it and then returning it to the patient's body. The second method involved sewing a miniature electrifying power supply along with two tiny electrodes directly into the lumen of an artery. For long term treatment, the mini electrifying unit needed to be removed and relocated to a new artery site after 30-45 days since scar tissue and calcification forming around the implant unit would lead to artery blockage. Kaali (along with co-inventor Peter Schwolsky) filed for a patent on this implantable electrifying device on Nov 16, 1990 and nine months later was granted patent #5,139,684 on August 18, 1992.
It's interesting to note two things here:
1. In order to obtain a patent from the United States Patent Office, Kaali and Schwolsky had to prove that the device works as claimed. Lacking solid proof, US patents are simply not granted.
2. Very often it takes years to obtain a patent, yet this patent was granted in only nine months; a further indication to me of the strength of their demonstrated claims
It's also interesting to note that other than the 3 publications mentioned above and the March '91 AIDS conference, nothing again appeared in print, radio, or TV about this important discovery as a potential treatment and cure for AIDS from Kaali and company. Most knowledgeable observers feel that Kaali and Lyman's discovery was intentionally suppressed following the March '91 AIDS conference presentation.
If AIDS research was on the level and not the sham that it actually is, this should have made front page news around the world. (Around 1999, I was contacted by a woman with AIDS who had managed to reach Dr. William Lyman over the phone. She asked him about his experiments with Kaali regarding blood electrification and if she could obtain the treatment through them. Lyman denied any knowledge of any AIDS treatment or cure. He said he never heard of Dr. Kaali and he had no idea what she was talking about concerning blood electrification and then hung up on her. What does that tell about the power of the people behind the suppression of this discovery?)" [end]
Ken Adachi, http://educate-yourself.org/cn/LymanKaalibiocompatibleHIV1996report18nov06.shtml
-
There are other patents on the books for a AIDS cure. The MO is the same. Once filed, they are quickly surpressed and the inventers never heard of again. More in part 2, next week.
How Do I Say Thank You? - A letter from Ron Paul
In Iowa, many hundreds of volunteers worked day and night for our campaign. College kids took their Christmas vacations in the snow for freedom. Thousands of people donated to make it all possible. We had many phone calls, brochures, mailings, advertising. Revolutionaries from all over the country sent handwritten letters to every voter, and despite national media attacks and censorship, we got more than 10% of the vote. We also soundly beat a certain ex-mayor who started off the first debate by attacking a pro-American foreign policy and the explanatory doctrine of "blowback," the CIA's term for foreign intervention that causes trouble for us in return. The Golden Rule applies to nations as well as to individuals.
And speaking of debates, FOX blocked my participation in its last New Hampshire debate, but I think that hurt FOX more than us. We had a terrifically successful townhall meeting at the same time, and Jay Leno invited me on the Tonight Show again to discuss it. Many members of our movement were galvanized to overcome the bias, including me!
In our Iowa campaign, since it was a caucus, we were dealing with party activists for the most part, not the people. And some of the activists were very unhappy to hear our views, trying to scream them down! Others thought that peace violates Christianity. But New Hampshire is another story. There is a state and a people tailor-made for us. Live Free! Then there are Michigan, South Carolina, and Super Tuesday and its nearly 20 primaries. Frankly, we need $23 million more to have a chance of beating the establishment candidates.
I am working hard for our ideas, as I know you are. The attacks and even smears will increase as we do better. But they will not defeat our ideas. They cannot defeat out ideas. At this moment of urgency for America, with spending, taxes, spying, inflation, and wars out of control and threatening all we love, let us rededicate ourselves to freedom, prosperity, and peace. Already, I owe you all my thanks. Join me in this great endeavor in New Hampshire and beyond. Please make your most generous donation now: https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate
Sincerely,
Ron
And speaking of debates, FOX blocked my participation in its last New Hampshire debate, but I think that hurt FOX more than us. We had a terrifically successful townhall meeting at the same time, and Jay Leno invited me on the Tonight Show again to discuss it. Many members of our movement were galvanized to overcome the bias, including me!
In our Iowa campaign, since it was a caucus, we were dealing with party activists for the most part, not the people. And some of the activists were very unhappy to hear our views, trying to scream them down! Others thought that peace violates Christianity. But New Hampshire is another story. There is a state and a people tailor-made for us. Live Free! Then there are Michigan, South Carolina, and Super Tuesday and its nearly 20 primaries. Frankly, we need $23 million more to have a chance of beating the establishment candidates.
I am working hard for our ideas, as I know you are. The attacks and even smears will increase as we do better. But they will not defeat our ideas. They cannot defeat out ideas. At this moment of urgency for America, with spending, taxes, spying, inflation, and wars out of control and threatening all we love, let us rededicate ourselves to freedom, prosperity, and peace. Already, I owe you all my thanks. Join me in this great endeavor in New Hampshire and beyond. Please make your most generous donation now: https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate
Sincerely,
Ron
Israel's richest man emigrates to Britain - and buys a £35m, bullet-proof mansion - pays no taxes
Lev Leviev, who until a week ago was classified as the richest man in Israel, has joined the growing list of Israeli billionaires who have made their homes in London, where wealthy foreigners are not asked to pay tax on income earned overseas.This month, Mr Leviev officially moved into a bullet-proof house in Hampstead, which he bought for £35m. His near neighbours include several other mega-rich Israeli tycoons who prefer UK tax rates. In Israel, they are liable for tax on all their income, no matter where it is from.
Mr Leviev is famous in international circles as the man who broke the cartel controlled by the multinational diamond company, De Beers, by buying up diamond mines in Russia, Angola and Namibia. It is said that one third of all the diamonds sold anywhere in the world are cut and polished by his company.
Recently, he also went on a worldwide property buying spree, and opened a jewellery shop in New York's Madison Avenue. His acquisitions included the former New York Times building, for which he paid almost £300m.
News of his departure has shocked the Israeli business community and created a political headache for its government, because of the drain of wealth from Tel Aviv to London. Among those who have made their homes in London are Zvi Meitar, the founder of one of Israel's biggest law firms; Benny Steinmitz, a diamond dealer and property tycoon; Yigal Zilka, head of Queenco Leisure International; and the real estate developer, Sammy Shimon.
Mr Leviev's departure knocked 11 per cent off the stock market value of his company, Africa-Israel Investments. Officially, his spokesman has said that the multinational nature of Mr Leviev's business meant he has spent more time in London than Tel Aviv over the past year. Unofficially, another motive for moving is a dispute with the government over his 2002 tax bill.
His wife, Olga, and his two youngest children, aged 15 and 13, have also moved to London. Their other seven children have stayed in Israel, where their daughter Tzvia Leviev-Alazarov, will take charge of the family's Israeli interests. Just before he left, Mr Leviev sold his private jet and he is reported to have bought a bigger one.
Last September, Forbes magazine listed Mr Leviev as the 12th richest man in the Middle East, with a fortune of just over £2bn. He is thought to have grown richer since. He is a friend of the Russian oligarch, Roman Abramovich, and introduced him to Avram Grant, who was appointed manager of Chelsea football club last September.
Until now, Mr Leviev's life has been a success story that would have delighted Israel's founding fathers. His family, who are strict Bukharian Orthodox Jews, arrived penniless, in 1971, from Uzbekistan, then part of the Soviet Union. His grandfather had been deported to Siberia. Soon after reaching Israel, Mr Leviev left school to become a diamond cutter, and upheld a family tradition by circumcising his sons, and the sons of work colleagues.
Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/
-
By not paying taxes, he does not pay his fair share to society or his host country. I guess his religion means you don't contribute, just remove foreskin --blogger
Monday, 7 January 2008
"Humanity has been hijacked by a Satanic force that would supplant God and distort reality"
Is 'Secret Of The Jews' Another 'Forgery'? By Henry Makow PhD, 1-7-8
In 1885, the Tsarist agent who secured "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Yuliana Glinka, sent another report to the Okhrana that linked Illuminati Jews and Freemasons to a satanic conspiracy against civilization. According to this document , Freemasonry is modeled on Judaism, i.e. a secret society whose real aims are hidden from the membership.
"The Secret of the Jews" would have disappeared down the memory hole but for James Webb's description of it in his book "The Occult Establishment" (1976; pp. 234-243.) His source seems to be a Russian book entitled "Protokoly Sionskikh Mudreisov" (Berlin 1923, pp.139-144) by Yuri Dyelevsky.Now, Webb's book is also slipping away.
James Webb was a Scottish genius who considered himself a rationalist. He wrote three encyclopedic histories of the occult before blowing his brains out with his hunting rifle in 1980 at the tender age of 34.
Webb was anxious for preferment so he believed both "Protocols" and "Secret" were forgeries concocted by Glinka , a Theosophist who wished to foster anti-Antisemitism. In my view, both documents confirm that our broad historical and cultural experience is largely the result of an ongoing occult spell cast by the cabalist (Masonic) world central banking cartel using the mass media and education system.
In the words of former British Defence Secretary Dennis Healey, "World events do not occur by accident. They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; and most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse strings."
He could have added cultural and intellectual movements as well. Without mention to the public, Masonic power and influence covertly control western society and culture.
"THE SECRET OF THE JEWS"
Unlike the "Protocols," the "Secret" document does not pretend to be written by Illuminati Jewish conspirators. Rather it purports to be information from a knowledgeable person who wished to alert Tsarist authorities.
Glinka gave the document to her superior General Orzheyevsky who wrote an introduction saying it contains "exclusive material which confirms an invisible link between the Jewish faith and Freemasonry." He blames the Masons for being the "root of all evil" and accuses them of trying to "negate and destroy everything." He says their ultimate goal is nihilism or "nothingness."
According to Webb, Orzheyevsky presented it to General Cherevin who filed it, suggesting he may have been a Mason himself. But perhaps as a matter of conscience, he left a copy in his Will for the Tsar. Apparently the document was read in 1900 by Minister of the Interior Stolypin who dismissed it as "propaganda."
I am not expert enough to say how much of this information is accurate but I think it should be on the record.
Webb paraphrases as follows: Jewish "monotheism" was actually a part of "one all- embracing worldwide religious brotherhood" (which included Indian and Chaldean Magi and Egyptian hierophants.) The doctrine was introduced to the Jews by Moses who instituted a ceremony of initiation circumcision-and a grade structure symbolizing the three different levels of understanding; one for the ordinary people; one for the leaders and one for the priesthood.
"The essence of the doctrine was taken from the Emerald Tablets of Hermes Trismegistus [which was the mainstay of medieval alchemy]; and Moses also adopted the Egyptian system of hieroglyphs. The result was that the inner meaning of the religious symbolism was known only to the Essenes , the esoteric community of Jewish adepts." (Webb 235)
Apparently, Jesus spent his youth among this community and learned their secret doctrine. "His mastery of this lore partly accounts for the rapid spread of Christianity. The untimely death of the apostle John robbed the Christians of their true understanding of the fundamental hidden truths, for it prevented their transmission from high priest to high priest."
When Titus sacked Jerusalem in 70 AD a small community of Essenes was living isolated in the desert, and they became the custodians of the secret religion of antiquity. It is from them that the present clandestine organization of Jewish Freemasonry is descended. In other words, according to this view, Jewish society was dominated by an pagan and occult ideology using monotheism and the Mosaic code as a facade.
THE HIDDEN HAND IN HISTORY
The document then traces the activity of this secret society throughout history. It claims this society instigated The Crusades in order to see Jerusalem exalted as the capital of the world and the seat of the papacy; and it established the Knights Templars to resurrect the Temple of Solomon in the Jewish interest.
"At this point the Jewish secret society had begun its work of recruiting collaborators among the Christians. This was to continue through various occult groups and eventually among the Freemasons. The achievements of the secret society to date-Humanism, the French Revolution, the American War of Independence, the expulsion of the Turks from Europe, Capitalism, the unification of Italy, the 1848 International are merely masks for the ultimate goals of Jewry." (236-237)
By 1895, the Conspiracy had settled on a few main methods of attack: the encouragement of the liberal bourgeois intelligentsia and all secularist elements of society; the introduction of the capitalist system and the destruction of the landed nobility, by inciting discontent among the peasantry.
The Jewish Secret Society has successfully recruited Christians to work unwittingly for the benefit of its religious aims. According to the lost document, "The basic principles have remained the same: to undermine fundamentals, sow discord, and incite intellects; in a word, expressly serving as the fermenting agent in the crumbly amorphous mass of the Christian people." (243)
The document could be updated by adding the Bolshevik Revolution, World Wars One and Two, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq as stops on the way to thinly veiled totalitarian world government.
THE SECRET SOCIETY PRINCIPLE
Many of our ideals, while valid, are used to attract people who can then be manipulated for hidden ends. This may be why so few ideals ever are realized.
An authority has written that esoteric bodies like Theosophy or Freemasonry "have consisted no doubt largely of harmless enthusiasts ...But they have also been used as a cover for political intrigue and as a net wherein to catch, test and select persons who could be used for subversive ends. For it is one of the methods of the revolutionary directorate to use, wherever possible, harmless bodies as their cloak, and innocent people as their unconscious agents..." ("Trail of the Serpent," p. 203)
These innocent people, or "useful idiots" as the Communists called them, have the added advantage of attacking anyone foolhardy enough to question their cause. Innocents have so much invested they cannot comprehend they may have been duped. Thus Satan fills his ranks with people who prefer a comfortable lie to a bitter truth.
"Useful idiots" also useful take the blame when opposition to the hidden agenda grows. Hence, we have antisemitism.
The Holocaust was used to dupe Jews into taking Palestine to establish a "national homeland." Only now do we learn that Israel was the reason for the the Holocaust and not vice-versa. Israel's real purpose is to be the capital of the Rothschild's one-world tyranny. But would Jews have sacrificed their money and lives for that? I doubt it.
The same applies to Americans in general. The "American dream" is just that, bait to hoodwink Americans. The US Constitution was easily bypassed in the critical matters of printing money and authorizing war . Now the US is the Rothschild's steamroller breaking up and assimilating countries like Iraq (and soon Iran and Pakistan?) in the NWO. Of course the bankers instigated 9-11 to psychologically manipulate Americans into performing this role, just as they instigated the Holocaust to motivate Jews.
THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES
In the Oscar winning picture "Chicago" a gun wielding wife catches her husband in bed with two naked women. http://www.savethemales.ca/ 170203.html
In 1885, the Tsarist agent who secured "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Yuliana Glinka, sent another report to the Okhrana that linked Illuminati Jews and Freemasons to a satanic conspiracy against civilization. According to this document , Freemasonry is modeled on Judaism, i.e. a secret society whose real aims are hidden from the membership.
"The Secret of the Jews" would have disappeared down the memory hole but for James Webb's description of it in his book "The Occult Establishment" (1976; pp. 234-243.) His source seems to be a Russian book entitled "Protokoly Sionskikh Mudreisov" (Berlin 1923, pp.139-144) by Yuri Dyelevsky.Now, Webb's book is also slipping away.
James Webb was a Scottish genius who considered himself a rationalist. He wrote three encyclopedic histories of the occult before blowing his brains out with his hunting rifle in 1980 at the tender age of 34.
Webb was anxious for preferment so he believed both "Protocols" and "Secret" were forgeries concocted by Glinka , a Theosophist who wished to foster anti-Antisemitism. In my view, both documents confirm that our broad historical and cultural experience is largely the result of an ongoing occult spell cast by the cabalist (Masonic) world central banking cartel using the mass media and education system.
In the words of former British Defence Secretary Dennis Healey, "World events do not occur by accident. They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; and most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse strings."
He could have added cultural and intellectual movements as well. Without mention to the public, Masonic power and influence covertly control western society and culture.
"THE SECRET OF THE JEWS"
Unlike the "Protocols," the "Secret" document does not pretend to be written by Illuminati Jewish conspirators. Rather it purports to be information from a knowledgeable person who wished to alert Tsarist authorities.
Glinka gave the document to her superior General Orzheyevsky who wrote an introduction saying it contains "exclusive material which confirms an invisible link between the Jewish faith and Freemasonry." He blames the Masons for being the "root of all evil" and accuses them of trying to "negate and destroy everything." He says their ultimate goal is nihilism or "nothingness."
According to Webb, Orzheyevsky presented it to General Cherevin who filed it, suggesting he may have been a Mason himself. But perhaps as a matter of conscience, he left a copy in his Will for the Tsar. Apparently the document was read in 1900 by Minister of the Interior Stolypin who dismissed it as "propaganda."
I am not expert enough to say how much of this information is accurate but I think it should be on the record.
Webb paraphrases as follows: Jewish "monotheism" was actually a part of "one all- embracing worldwide religious brotherhood" (which included Indian and Chaldean Magi and Egyptian hierophants.) The doctrine was introduced to the Jews by Moses who instituted a ceremony of initiation circumcision-and a grade structure symbolizing the three different levels of understanding; one for the ordinary people; one for the leaders and one for the priesthood.
"The essence of the doctrine was taken from the Emerald Tablets of Hermes Trismegistus [which was the mainstay of medieval alchemy]; and Moses also adopted the Egyptian system of hieroglyphs. The result was that the inner meaning of the religious symbolism was known only to the Essenes , the esoteric community of Jewish adepts." (Webb 235)
Apparently, Jesus spent his youth among this community and learned their secret doctrine. "His mastery of this lore partly accounts for the rapid spread of Christianity. The untimely death of the apostle John robbed the Christians of their true understanding of the fundamental hidden truths, for it prevented their transmission from high priest to high priest."
When Titus sacked Jerusalem in 70 AD a small community of Essenes was living isolated in the desert, and they became the custodians of the secret religion of antiquity. It is from them that the present clandestine organization of Jewish Freemasonry is descended. In other words, according to this view, Jewish society was dominated by an pagan and occult ideology using monotheism and the Mosaic code as a facade.
THE HIDDEN HAND IN HISTORY
The document then traces the activity of this secret society throughout history. It claims this society instigated The Crusades in order to see Jerusalem exalted as the capital of the world and the seat of the papacy; and it established the Knights Templars to resurrect the Temple of Solomon in the Jewish interest.
"At this point the Jewish secret society had begun its work of recruiting collaborators among the Christians. This was to continue through various occult groups and eventually among the Freemasons. The achievements of the secret society to date-Humanism, the French Revolution, the American War of Independence, the expulsion of the Turks from Europe, Capitalism, the unification of Italy, the 1848 International are merely masks for the ultimate goals of Jewry." (236-237)
By 1895, the Conspiracy had settled on a few main methods of attack: the encouragement of the liberal bourgeois intelligentsia and all secularist elements of society; the introduction of the capitalist system and the destruction of the landed nobility, by inciting discontent among the peasantry.
The Jewish Secret Society has successfully recruited Christians to work unwittingly for the benefit of its religious aims. According to the lost document, "The basic principles have remained the same: to undermine fundamentals, sow discord, and incite intellects; in a word, expressly serving as the fermenting agent in the crumbly amorphous mass of the Christian people." (243)
The document could be updated by adding the Bolshevik Revolution, World Wars One and Two, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq as stops on the way to thinly veiled totalitarian world government.
THE SECRET SOCIETY PRINCIPLE
Many of our ideals, while valid, are used to attract people who can then be manipulated for hidden ends. This may be why so few ideals ever are realized.
An authority has written that esoteric bodies like Theosophy or Freemasonry "have consisted no doubt largely of harmless enthusiasts ...But they have also been used as a cover for political intrigue and as a net wherein to catch, test and select persons who could be used for subversive ends. For it is one of the methods of the revolutionary directorate to use, wherever possible, harmless bodies as their cloak, and innocent people as their unconscious agents..." ("Trail of the Serpent," p. 203)
These innocent people, or "useful idiots" as the Communists called them, have the added advantage of attacking anyone foolhardy enough to question their cause. Innocents have so much invested they cannot comprehend they may have been duped. Thus Satan fills his ranks with people who prefer a comfortable lie to a bitter truth.
"Useful idiots" also useful take the blame when opposition to the hidden agenda grows. Hence, we have antisemitism.
The Holocaust was used to dupe Jews into taking Palestine to establish a "national homeland." Only now do we learn that Israel was the reason for the the Holocaust and not vice-versa. Israel's real purpose is to be the capital of the Rothschild's one-world tyranny. But would Jews have sacrificed their money and lives for that? I doubt it.
The same applies to Americans in general. The "American dream" is just that, bait to hoodwink Americans. The US Constitution was easily bypassed in the critical matters of printing money and authorizing war . Now the US is the Rothschild's steamroller breaking up and assimilating countries like Iraq (and soon Iran and Pakistan?) in the NWO. Of course the bankers instigated 9-11 to psychologically manipulate Americans into performing this role, just as they instigated the Holocaust to motivate Jews.
THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES
In the Oscar winning picture "Chicago" a gun wielding wife catches her husband in bed with two naked women. http://www.savethemales.ca/ 170203.html
"Don't shoot. I'm alone," he protests. "What about those women?" she demands. "Believe what I tell you," he replies, "not what you can see."
This is your future: a solipsism spun by the Zionist media. Like the betrayed wife, we must ignore what our eyeballs tell us: No wreckage from passenger planes at the Pentagon or in Shanksville PA.
WTC-7, a 47-story building also owned by Larry Silverstein near the twin towers pre-rigged and demolished on Sept. 11. It wasn't hit by a plane.
Government news organizations like the CBC & BBC are the worst. Recently the BBC was exposed for removing from an interview Benazir Bhutto's revelation that Osama bin Laden is dead. www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=7790
Like the betrayed wife, we must ignore that the world "Super- government" demanded by the "Protocols of Zion" is unfolding before our eyes; that all Western government are controlled by Zionists (Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown, Bush and Harper) and that Christianity has been gutted
Far from being a "superpower" the United States is a Golem-- the automaton of Jewish folklore now used to vanquish enemies of banker world government.
Humanity has been hijacked by a Satanic force that would supplant God and distort reality. The strategy is to buy off the ruling classes with important-sounding jobs and the sheeple with gadgets and sex so neither really cares about personal freedom. Spiritually and morally, the human race is being cryogenically frozen in a state of perpetual mediocrity and dysfunction.
The Illuminati see us as underage children. According to "The Protocols": The peoples of the world "are...only children under age, precisely as are their governments." [15.20] The ideal situation for the 'cattle' nations (styled in "The Protocols" as 'the Goyim') is "to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which is not given the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public. That is the first secret." [5.10]
The strategy seems to be working.
-
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order." (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving your comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com
-
Source: www. rense.com
How Academia and American Corporations use China to shaft America: 20 Million manufacturing jobs gone in three decades
Within 20 years Americans will work for a bowl of rice a day and the Chinese will be driving new cars. The Chinese Communists know what they are doing. They know American businesses are greedy and will sell their sole to the devil and the Government does not give a S**t. This 8 minute video will put things in perspective.
This link from the US State department tells Chinese students how to screw the American Taxpayer. Take a look for yourself. http://beijing.usembassy-china.org.cn/012605e.html
How the Neo-con Goons program our subconscious minds to accept their War Agenda
This 3 minute video really describes the actions of the current United States Government administration and their Talmudic principles of racism and hate. Think about it!
LIVING standards in Britain are set to rise above those in America
LIVING standards in Britain are set to rise above those in America for the first time since the 19th century, according to a report by the respected Oxford Economics consultancy.
The calculations suggest that, measured by gross domestic product per capita, Britain can now hold its head up high in the economic stakes after more than a century of playing second fiddle to the Americans.
It says that GDP per head in Britain will be £23,500 this year, compared with £23,250 in America, reflecting not only the strength of the pound against the dollar but also the UK economy’s record run of growth and rising incomes going back to the early 1990s.
In those days, according to Oxford Economics, Britain’s GDP per capita was 34% below that in America, 33% less than in Germany and 26% lower than in France. Now, not only have average incomes crept above those in America but they are more than 8% above France (£21,700) and Germany (£21,665).
“The past 15 years have seen a dramatic change in the UK’s economic performance and its position in the world economy,” said Adrian Cooper, managing director of Oxford Economics. “No longer are we the ‘sick man of Europe’. Indeed, our calculations suggest that UK living standards are now a match for those of the US.”
Although many people will be surprised by the figures, Americans have long complained that average incomes have been stagnant in their country. One often-quoted statistical comparison suggests that in real terms the median male full-time salary in America is no higher now than it was in the 1970s.
Oxford Economics says that while the comparisons are affected by sterling’s high value against the dollar, they also reflect longer-term factors. “The UK has been catching up steadily with living standards in the US since 2001 � so, it is a well established trend rather than simply the result of currency fluctuations,” its report says.
It concedes, however, that a significant fall in the pound against other currencies would push Britain back down the ladder. It has assumed an exchange rate of just over $2 for the purpose of the calculation but in recent days the pound has slipped below that level.
The Oxford analysts also point out that Americans benefit from lower prices than those in Britain. With an adjustment made for this “purchasing power parity”, the average American has more spending power than his UK counterpart and pays lower taxes. (In the run-up to Christmas many Britons travelled to New York and other American cities to take advantage of the strength of sterling against the dollar and those lower prices.)
However, the British typically have significantly longer holidays than Americans as well as access to “free” healthcare.
The figures may be of small comfort to Britons worried about house prices and facing a severe squeeze on their incomes this year as a result of record petrol prices and rising energy bills.
Citigroup, which was the most accurate forecaster of Britain’s economy last year, predicts the slowest rise in consumer spending this year since 1992.
“After the credit-fuelled boom in domestic demand and asset prices, the UK economy now faces a hangover, with slowing credit growth, falling property prices and tightening lending standards,” said Michael Saunders, its UK economist.
Last week oil prices hit $100 a barrel, presaging a rise in petrol and diesel prices on the fore-courts. Npower, Britain’s fourth biggest energy supplier, announced that energy prices would go up sharply, raising the prospect of the average household bill rising above £1,000 for the first time.
America overtook Britain economically in the final years of the 19th century, during the so-called second industrial revolution, which brought mass manufacture and sharply rising prosperity to the United States.
News source: www.thetimes.co.uk
The calculations suggest that, measured by gross domestic product per capita, Britain can now hold its head up high in the economic stakes after more than a century of playing second fiddle to the Americans.
It says that GDP per head in Britain will be £23,500 this year, compared with £23,250 in America, reflecting not only the strength of the pound against the dollar but also the UK economy’s record run of growth and rising incomes going back to the early 1990s.
In those days, according to Oxford Economics, Britain’s GDP per capita was 34% below that in America, 33% less than in Germany and 26% lower than in France. Now, not only have average incomes crept above those in America but they are more than 8% above France (£21,700) and Germany (£21,665).
“The past 15 years have seen a dramatic change in the UK’s economic performance and its position in the world economy,” said Adrian Cooper, managing director of Oxford Economics. “No longer are we the ‘sick man of Europe’. Indeed, our calculations suggest that UK living standards are now a match for those of the US.”
Although many people will be surprised by the figures, Americans have long complained that average incomes have been stagnant in their country. One often-quoted statistical comparison suggests that in real terms the median male full-time salary in America is no higher now than it was in the 1970s.
Oxford Economics says that while the comparisons are affected by sterling’s high value against the dollar, they also reflect longer-term factors. “The UK has been catching up steadily with living standards in the US since 2001 � so, it is a well established trend rather than simply the result of currency fluctuations,” its report says.
It concedes, however, that a significant fall in the pound against other currencies would push Britain back down the ladder. It has assumed an exchange rate of just over $2 for the purpose of the calculation but in recent days the pound has slipped below that level.
The Oxford analysts also point out that Americans benefit from lower prices than those in Britain. With an adjustment made for this “purchasing power parity”, the average American has more spending power than his UK counterpart and pays lower taxes. (In the run-up to Christmas many Britons travelled to New York and other American cities to take advantage of the strength of sterling against the dollar and those lower prices.)
However, the British typically have significantly longer holidays than Americans as well as access to “free” healthcare.
The figures may be of small comfort to Britons worried about house prices and facing a severe squeeze on their incomes this year as a result of record petrol prices and rising energy bills.
Citigroup, which was the most accurate forecaster of Britain’s economy last year, predicts the slowest rise in consumer spending this year since 1992.
“After the credit-fuelled boom in domestic demand and asset prices, the UK economy now faces a hangover, with slowing credit growth, falling property prices and tightening lending standards,” said Michael Saunders, its UK economist.
Last week oil prices hit $100 a barrel, presaging a rise in petrol and diesel prices on the fore-courts. Npower, Britain’s fourth biggest energy supplier, announced that energy prices would go up sharply, raising the prospect of the average household bill rising above £1,000 for the first time.
America overtook Britain economically in the final years of the 19th century, during the so-called second industrial revolution, which brought mass manufacture and sharply rising prosperity to the United States.
News source: www.thetimes.co.uk
Sunday, 6 January 2008
An American soldier speaks about the war in Iraq
This video is no longer available. It was censored from the internet to prevent people from knowing the truth. Sorry
A new way to kill us - Nano supplements and cosmetics.
By Marcus Salek, Prague.
-
According to the Georgia Guide stones, the NWO must reduce the population of the planet to 500,000,000 people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
-
Currently their are about 6 trillion people on the planet. That means 80% of us need to go!. Apparently AIDS, depleted uranium, cancer causing toxins, wars, bird flu, GM crops and starvation are not working fast enough. So the New World Order had to find a quicker method to cull the world population.
-
Nanotechnology comes to the rescue! We were all told that it will revolutionize medicine and be able to fight disease. That was a lie, since when as modern medicine ever cured anything? Maybe its just another way to kill us off while the Governments do nothing. Hmm, do you think?
-
This article in the Daily Mail by Sean Poulter should worry all of humanity.
[start] "A breed of Frankenfood is being introduced into human diet and cosmetics with potentially disastrous consequences, experts said last night. [this was news to me]
Academics, consumer groups and Government officials are warning that the arrival of nanotechnology threatens dangerous changes to the body and the environment. [then why is it being produced]
The particles it uses are so small - 80,000 times thinner than a human hair - that they can pass through membranes protecting the brain or babies in the womb.
Nano health supplements, such as antioxidants, are already on the market while the first of hundreds of new foods are expected to arrive in the next 12 months.
However, the products are being introduced without any regulation or independent assessment to ensure they are safe - mirroring the controversy over the launch of GM foods ten years ago. [Government in action, protecting the citizens?]
Some critics have talked of the threat of the creation of a "grey goo" of tiny particles with hidden harmful properties.
Prince Charles has said it would be "surprising" if the technology did not "offer similar upsets" to thalidomide - the morning sickness drug that caused children to be born with deformed limbs.
Professor Vicki Stone, Professor of Toxicology at Napier University in Edinburgh, is concerned about unforeseen side effects. [are you ringing up the PM tonight Prof. Stone, or are you down at the pub having a pint with the lads]
"We know very little about the ability of nanoparticles to move around the body, to accumulate or to be excreted, or their potential to cause toxic effects in organs," she said.
However, nanotech advocates have remarkable claims for the technology. For example, foods are in development that are said to stave off the aging process.
On a more trivial level, they suggest it would be possible to create a fizzy drink that changes flavour according to the number of times the can is shaken.
The consumer group Which? is about to launch a nanotech campaign arguing that consumers need to be consulted on the risks and benefits before it is too late.
The food and farming department Defra has published an independent report which admits there are serious gaps in safety data.
It warns: "There could be very significant implications for business and the wider community if potential risks are not identified and managed before any harm to the environment or human health may be done."
The report - Characterising the Risks Posed by Engineered Nanoparticles - states there is a shortage of research money.
It says the resulting absence of basic information about the particles means "it will be difficult or impossible to develop any general understanding of nanoparticle toxicology".
The report adds: "Transfer across biological barriers - e.g. to the brain or foetus - should be studied. Research into how long these tiny particles persist in the body is urgently needed."
It warns that work assessing human toxicology is being hamstrung by "profound difficulties in accessing relevant funding for these longer term projects".
Research by Which? found six out of ten people (61 per cent) have never heard of nanotechnology.
Sue Davies of Which? said: "The benefits that nanotechnologies can offer consumers are really exciting. [like quick death?]
'But before the market is flooded with products, it's crucial the Government addresses the lack of scientific understanding about how some nanoparticles behave."
The European Food Safety Authority last year held a conference on the future of food.
Dr Donald Bruce, an expert on food and ethics, told delegates that the arrival of nanotech foods has many similarities with GM products. [what conference - I never heard of a conference]
US corporations attempted to introduce GM before an effective safety regime could be established.
"One of the things to ask is do we need the benefits claimed by the producers?' he said. 'Also there is the underlying notion that we are tampering with nature."
Environment minister Phil Woolas admitted there were gaps in knowledge, but denied the Government was failing to provide enough research cash.
Tiny particles that have generated great hopes and growing concerns
Nanotechnology involves using a substance in particles that are so small that the substance takes on new properties.
The name of the technology comes from the size of the particles - one nanometre in diameter - a millionth of a millimetre. Reduced to this size, materials can suddenly show very different and unexpected properties.
For example, an opaque substance such as copper becomes transparent, or an inert metal such as platinum becomes a catalyst and triggers chemical reactions.
Advocates argue that such particles can be organised to work together to deliver specific effects in a piece of equipment or in the human body. [like controlling your brain?]
They can be used to build miniature hard drives that have an immense memory, so allowing further miniaturisation and sophistication of products such as computers and mobile phones.
Washing machines have been developed that release silver nanoparticles that will kill bacteria in dirty washing. [soap does the same thing]
Sun creams have been created so they become transparent rather than chalky white.
In medicine, it is claimed that nanotechnology will allow the creation of drugs that reach and treat a problem quickly. [ notice the word "treat" not cure]
Manufacturers are working on nanotech foods and supplements that are also designed to deliver specific health benefits. [bullshit]
Similarly, firms are working on developing anti-ageing foods, where nanotech particles associated with renewing the skin from the inside could be included in everyday products such as yoghurt, spreads or breakfast cereals.
The technology promises huge riches for firms which develop winning applications. [but if your customers are all dead, who will buy?]
One of the first group of nanoparticles being utilised are fullerenes - tiny hollow carbon balls and tubes. They are very heat resistant, strong and conduct electricity.
The football-shaped C60 fullerene is being used in some anti-ageing products. The creams are said to reduce fine lines and firm the skin.
C60 has some antioxidant properties in that it kills the rogue chemicals which damage cells. However, a high dose can itself damage cells.
Some nano particles are known to mimic the harmful effects of asbestos on the lungs. Consequently, they have the potential to trigger lung cancer if inhaled" [great, even cigarettes have a warning on the package]- [end]
-
WHY DO WE NEED THIS PRODUCT ANYWAY?
Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic
This article is worth publishing again. The question is Why a seed vault? If mankind stops messing with plant DNA, we wouldn't need a seed vault.
-
[Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature say the Georgia Guide stones. - Only 5.5 Trillion people to Go Mr. Gates]
-
Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic
Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t
by F. William Engdahl
Global Research, December 4, 2007
One thing Microsoft founder Bill Gates can’t be accused of is sloth. He was already programming at 14, founded Microsoft at age 20 while still a student at Harvard. By 1995 he had been listed by Forbes as the world’s richest man from being the largest shareholder in his Microsoft, a company which his relentless drive built into a de facto monopoly in software systems for personal computers.
In 2006 when most people in such a situation might think of retiring to a quiet Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energies to his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.
So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.
No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty.
On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group.
Doomsday Seed Vault
The seed bank is being built inside a mountain on Spitsbergen Island near the small village of Longyearbyen. It’s almost ready for ‘business’ according to their releases. The bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the vault's relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible human activity.
Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ What future do the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?
Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t
by F. William Engdahl
Global Research, December 4, 2007
One thing Microsoft founder Bill Gates can’t be accused of is sloth. He was already programming at 14, founded Microsoft at age 20 while still a student at Harvard. By 1995 he had been listed by Forbes as the world’s richest man from being the largest shareholder in his Microsoft, a company which his relentless drive built into a de facto monopoly in software systems for personal computers.
In 2006 when most people in such a situation might think of retiring to a quiet Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energies to his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.
So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.
No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty.
On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group.
Doomsday Seed Vault
The seed bank is being built inside a mountain on Spitsbergen Island near the small village of Longyearbyen. It’s almost ready for ‘business’ according to their releases. The bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the vault's relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible human activity.
Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ What future do the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?
Thursday, 3 January 2008
Selfish capitalism is bad for our mental health - US real wages drop below 1970- levels
Oliver James
Thursday January 3, 2008
The Guardian
By far the most significant consequence of "selfish capitalism" (Thatch/Blatcherism) has been a startling increase in the incidence of mental illness in both children and adults since the 1970s. As I report in my book, The Selfish Capitalist - Origins of Affluenza, World Health Organisation and nationally representative studies in the United States, Britain and Australia, reveal that it almost doubled between the early 80s and the turn of the century. These increases are very unlikely to be due to greater preparedness to acknowledge distress - the psychobabbling therapy culture was already established.
Add to this the astonishing fact that citizens of Selfish Capitalist, English-speaking nations (which tend to be one and the same) are twice as likely to suffer mental illness as those from mainland western Europe, which is largely Unselfish Capitalist in its political economy. An average 23% of Americans, Britons, Australians, New Zealanders and Canadians suffered in the last 12 months, but only 11.5% of Germans, Italians, French, Belgians, Spaniards and Dutch. The message could not be clearer. Selfish Capitalism, much more than genes, is extremely bad for your mental health. But why is it so toxic?
Readers of this newspaper will need little reminding that Selfish Capitalism has massively increased the wealth of the wealthy, robbing the average earner to give to the rich. There was no "trickle-down effect" after all.
The real wage of the average English-speaking person has remained the same - or, in the case of the US, decreased - since the 1970s. By more than halving the taxes of the richest and transferring the burden to the general population, Margaret Thatcher reinstated the rich's capital wealth after three postwar decades in which they had steadily become poorer.
Although I risk you glazing over at these statistics, it's worth remembering that the top 1% of British earners have doubled their share of the national income since 1982, from 6.5% to 13%, FTSE 100 chief executives now earning 133 times more than the average wage (against 20 times in 1980); and under Brown's chancellorship the richest 0.3% nobbled over half of all liquid assets (cash, instantly accessible income), increasing their share by 79% during the last five years.
In itself, this economic inequality does not cause mental illness. WHO studies show that some very inequitable developing nations, like Nigeria and China, also have the lowest prevalence of mental illness. Furthermore, inequity may be much greater in the English-speaking world today, but it is far less than it was at the end of the 19th century. While we have no way of knowing for sure, it is very possible that mental illness was nowhere near as widespread in, for instance, the US or Britain of that time.
What does the damage is the combination of inequality with the widespread relative materialism of Affluenza - placing a high value on money, possessions, appearances and fame when you already have enough income to meet your fundamental psychological needs. Survival materialism is healthy. If you need money for medicine or to buy a house, becoming very concerned about getting them does not make you mentally ill.
But Selfish Capitalism stokes up relative materialism: unrealistic aspirations and the expectation that they can be fulfilled. It does so to stimulate consumerism in order to increase profits and promote short-term economic growth. Indeed, I maintain that high levels of mental illness are essential to Selfish Capitalism, because needy, miserable people make greedy consumers and can be more easily suckered into perfectionist, competitive workaholism.
With overstimulated aspirations and expectations, the entrepreneurial fantasy society fosters the delusion that anyone can be Alan Sugar or Bill Gates, never mind that the actual likelihood of this occurring has diminished since the 1970s. A Briton turning 20 in 1978 was more likely than one doing so in 1990 to achieve upward mobility through education. Nonetheless, in the Big Brother/ It Could Be You society, great swaths of the population believe they can become rich and famous, and that it is highly desirable. This is most damaging of all - the ideology that material affluence is the key to fulfilment and open to anyone willing to work hard enough. If you don't succeed, there is only one person to blame - never mind that it couldn't be clearer that it's the system's fault, not yours.
Depressed or anxious, you work ever harder. Or maybe you collapse and join the sickness benefit queue, leaving it to people shipped in to do the low-paid jobs that society has taught you are too demeaning - let alone the unpaid ones, like looking after children or elderly parents, which are beneath contempt in the Nouveau Labour liturgy.
There is much tearing of hair across the media and advocacy of nose-pegging on these pages of the "grin and bear it" variety. In fact, there is an alternative. We desperately need - and before long, I predict we will get - a passionate, charismatic, probably female leader who advocates the Unselfish Capitalism of our neighbours. The pitch is simple. Not only would reduced consumerism and greater equality make us more ecologically sustainable, it would halve the prevalence of mental illness within a generation.
· Oliver James is discussing Selfish Capitalism with Will Self, Madeleine Bunting and Stewart Wallis in three London seminars this month
www.selfishcapitalist.com
Thursday January 3, 2008
The Guardian
By far the most significant consequence of "selfish capitalism" (Thatch/Blatcherism) has been a startling increase in the incidence of mental illness in both children and adults since the 1970s. As I report in my book, The Selfish Capitalist - Origins of Affluenza, World Health Organisation and nationally representative studies in the United States, Britain and Australia, reveal that it almost doubled between the early 80s and the turn of the century. These increases are very unlikely to be due to greater preparedness to acknowledge distress - the psychobabbling therapy culture was already established.
Add to this the astonishing fact that citizens of Selfish Capitalist, English-speaking nations (which tend to be one and the same) are twice as likely to suffer mental illness as those from mainland western Europe, which is largely Unselfish Capitalist in its political economy. An average 23% of Americans, Britons, Australians, New Zealanders and Canadians suffered in the last 12 months, but only 11.5% of Germans, Italians, French, Belgians, Spaniards and Dutch. The message could not be clearer. Selfish Capitalism, much more than genes, is extremely bad for your mental health. But why is it so toxic?
Readers of this newspaper will need little reminding that Selfish Capitalism has massively increased the wealth of the wealthy, robbing the average earner to give to the rich. There was no "trickle-down effect" after all.
The real wage of the average English-speaking person has remained the same - or, in the case of the US, decreased - since the 1970s. By more than halving the taxes of the richest and transferring the burden to the general population, Margaret Thatcher reinstated the rich's capital wealth after three postwar decades in which they had steadily become poorer.
Although I risk you glazing over at these statistics, it's worth remembering that the top 1% of British earners have doubled their share of the national income since 1982, from 6.5% to 13%, FTSE 100 chief executives now earning 133 times more than the average wage (against 20 times in 1980); and under Brown's chancellorship the richest 0.3% nobbled over half of all liquid assets (cash, instantly accessible income), increasing their share by 79% during the last five years.
In itself, this economic inequality does not cause mental illness. WHO studies show that some very inequitable developing nations, like Nigeria and China, also have the lowest prevalence of mental illness. Furthermore, inequity may be much greater in the English-speaking world today, but it is far less than it was at the end of the 19th century. While we have no way of knowing for sure, it is very possible that mental illness was nowhere near as widespread in, for instance, the US or Britain of that time.
What does the damage is the combination of inequality with the widespread relative materialism of Affluenza - placing a high value on money, possessions, appearances and fame when you already have enough income to meet your fundamental psychological needs. Survival materialism is healthy. If you need money for medicine or to buy a house, becoming very concerned about getting them does not make you mentally ill.
But Selfish Capitalism stokes up relative materialism: unrealistic aspirations and the expectation that they can be fulfilled. It does so to stimulate consumerism in order to increase profits and promote short-term economic growth. Indeed, I maintain that high levels of mental illness are essential to Selfish Capitalism, because needy, miserable people make greedy consumers and can be more easily suckered into perfectionist, competitive workaholism.
With overstimulated aspirations and expectations, the entrepreneurial fantasy society fosters the delusion that anyone can be Alan Sugar or Bill Gates, never mind that the actual likelihood of this occurring has diminished since the 1970s. A Briton turning 20 in 1978 was more likely than one doing so in 1990 to achieve upward mobility through education. Nonetheless, in the Big Brother/ It Could Be You society, great swaths of the population believe they can become rich and famous, and that it is highly desirable. This is most damaging of all - the ideology that material affluence is the key to fulfilment and open to anyone willing to work hard enough. If you don't succeed, there is only one person to blame - never mind that it couldn't be clearer that it's the system's fault, not yours.
Depressed or anxious, you work ever harder. Or maybe you collapse and join the sickness benefit queue, leaving it to people shipped in to do the low-paid jobs that society has taught you are too demeaning - let alone the unpaid ones, like looking after children or elderly parents, which are beneath contempt in the Nouveau Labour liturgy.
There is much tearing of hair across the media and advocacy of nose-pegging on these pages of the "grin and bear it" variety. In fact, there is an alternative. We desperately need - and before long, I predict we will get - a passionate, charismatic, probably female leader who advocates the Unselfish Capitalism of our neighbours. The pitch is simple. Not only would reduced consumerism and greater equality make us more ecologically sustainable, it would halve the prevalence of mental illness within a generation.
· Oliver James is discussing Selfish Capitalism with Will Self, Madeleine Bunting and Stewart Wallis in three London seminars this month
www.selfishcapitalist.com
Wednesday, 2 January 2008
Review of 'Seeds of Destruction' - By Bill Engdahl
A GM Catastrophe in the Making
Is there anything Evil that Henry Kissinger is not involved in?
Engdahl's newest book is just out from the Centre for Research on Globalization. It's a sequel to his first one called "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" and subject of this review. It's the diabolical story of how Washington and four Anglo-American agribusiness giants plan world domination by patenting life forms to gain worldwide control of our food supply and why that prospect is chilling. The book's compelling contents are reviewed below in-depth so readers will know the type future Henry Kissinger had in mind in 1970 when he said: "Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people."
Remember also, this cabal is one of many interconnected ones with fearsome power and ruthless intent to use it - Big Banks controlling the Federal Reserve and our money, Big Oil our world energy resources, Big Media our information, Big Pharma our health, Big Technology our state-of-the-art everything and watching us, Big Defense our wars, Big Pentagon waging them, and other corporate predators exploiting our lives for profit. Engdahl's book focuses brilliantly on one of them. To fully cover its vital contents, this review will be in three parts for more detail and to make it easily digestible. More at http://www.rense.com/general79/seeed.htm
Engdahl's newest book is just out from the Centre for Research on Globalization. It's a sequel to his first one called "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" and subject of this review. It's the diabolical story of how Washington and four Anglo-American agribusiness giants plan world domination by patenting life forms to gain worldwide control of our food supply and why that prospect is chilling. The book's compelling contents are reviewed below in-depth so readers will know the type future Henry Kissinger had in mind in 1970 when he said: "Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people."
Remember also, this cabal is one of many interconnected ones with fearsome power and ruthless intent to use it - Big Banks controlling the Federal Reserve and our money, Big Oil our world energy resources, Big Media our information, Big Pharma our health, Big Technology our state-of-the-art everything and watching us, Big Defense our wars, Big Pentagon waging them, and other corporate predators exploiting our lives for profit. Engdahl's book focuses brilliantly on one of them. To fully cover its vital contents, this review will be in three parts for more detail and to make it easily digestible. More at http://www.rense.com/general79/seeed.htm
Own Media Stock? - It's time to divest
By Marcus Salek, Prague
SPREAD LIES? - NOT WITH MY MONEY!
Here is a list of worldwide media conglomerates to target for disinvestment. If you own stock, maybe you should dump it.
AOL/Time Warner
General Electric
Viacom, Inc
Walt Disney Company
Liberty Media Corporation,
AT and T corporation,
News Corporation
Bertelsmann
Vivendi Universal
Sony
http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html -
-
If you can disinvest and run their stock prices into the ground, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop buying from all companies advertising on mass media, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop watching television, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop using your credit cards, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop going to movies, maybe they will take notice,
If you stop buying books, maybe they will take notice,
If you stop going to Disneyland, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop consuming, maybe they will take notice.
If you convert your bank deposits into cash money, maybe they will take notice.
If you switch your Internet provider to a independent company not owned by the major media groups, maybe they will take notice.
If you are too addicted to consumerism and not willing to play hard ball, stop complaining!
SPREAD LIES? - NOT WITH MY MONEY!
Here is a list of worldwide media conglomerates to target for disinvestment. If you own stock, maybe you should dump it.
AOL/Time Warner
General Electric
Viacom, Inc
Walt Disney Company
Liberty Media Corporation,
AT and T corporation,
News Corporation
Bertelsmann
Vivendi Universal
Sony
http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html -
-
If you can disinvest and run their stock prices into the ground, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop buying from all companies advertising on mass media, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop watching television, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop using your credit cards, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop going to movies, maybe they will take notice,
If you stop buying books, maybe they will take notice,
If you stop going to Disneyland, maybe they will take notice.
If you stop consuming, maybe they will take notice.
If you convert your bank deposits into cash money, maybe they will take notice.
If you switch your Internet provider to a independent company not owned by the major media groups, maybe they will take notice.
If you are too addicted to consumerism and not willing to play hard ball, stop complaining!
2008 predictions from SAXO bank, Denmark
Denmark-based Saxo Bank predicts Ron Paul presidency in 2008, saying US economy will plunge into a depression prior to the election.
The Bank predicted that Ron Paul, US congressman and Republican presidential candidate, will win the US 2008 presidential election.
Saxo Bank says the US economy will shrink by 25% and the Chinese economy will decrease by 40%. The economic downturn will come about as a result of the housing crash.
Ron Paul has been critical of the Federal Reserve and has blamed the Federal Reserve for causing the real estate bubble and crash. Paul has said that the loose monetary policy of the Fed had artificially inflated real estate prices which lead to the collapse.
Paul supports 'Sound Money' and opposes the Federal Reserve's 'Inflation Tax' and says that he wants to prevent a dollar collapse.
Saxo Bank also predicts $175 a barrel for oil and the price of grain will double. Some have predicted that oil will climb to $250 a barrel if the US attacks Iran. The bank also predicts that 30% of large building companies will go bankrupt.
The Bank predicted that Ron Paul, US congressman and Republican presidential candidate, will win the US 2008 presidential election.
Saxo Bank says the US economy will shrink by 25% and the Chinese economy will decrease by 40%. The economic downturn will come about as a result of the housing crash.
Ron Paul has been critical of the Federal Reserve and has blamed the Federal Reserve for causing the real estate bubble and crash. Paul has said that the loose monetary policy of the Fed had artificially inflated real estate prices which lead to the collapse.
Paul supports 'Sound Money' and opposes the Federal Reserve's 'Inflation Tax' and says that he wants to prevent a dollar collapse.
Saxo Bank also predicts $175 a barrel for oil and the price of grain will double. Some have predicted that oil will climb to $250 a barrel if the US attacks Iran. The bank also predicts that 30% of large building companies will go bankrupt.
Tuesday, 1 January 2008
Bloomberg tempted by open race for the US presidency: - Right on Schedule!
Michael Bloomberg with David Rockefeller, George Pataki, and Ronald LauderBy Marcus Salek, prague
-
Todays headline news story from the UK Independent reads "“Bloomberg tempted by open race for the US presidency”
Independent:
“The already topsy-turvy race for the White House took on an even more complicated hue last night amid fresh signs that Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire Mayor of New York, may quietly be accelerating preparations to enter as an independent candidate.”
-
I find this announcement interesting and right on schedule as expected. Creditable news sources report that he was already picked by the Bilderberg group last year. Judging by the picture above, I believe its probably true.
Here is an quote from an article which appeared in WorldNet Daily on Tuesday, 20 November 2007. It was a interview of Daniel Estulin titled" North American Union 'a couple years away'
-
WorldNet Daily:
“There are two sides in this equation; the powerful elite who control the world's wealth and the rest of humanity” Estulin "guarantees" today's Republican front-runner Rudy Giuliani will not get the nomination of his party. With less certitude, he speculates the current mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg, could still be positioned to head the GOP ticket. "Bloomberg, according to my sources within Bilderberg, will emerge as a credible candidate of consensus for the discredited American political establishment, your virtual "People's Choice" candidate," he says.”
Full article here: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58778
-
Usually when somebody visits a Bilderberg meeting, he is the next president of the United States. At least that has been the past history. I predict that Michael Bloomberg will announce his Candidacy before the end of January and start to sound more like Dr. Ron Paul in order to confuse the public and take the election away from Ron Paul. Happy New Year Paulites!
(David Estulin is author of the book "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group." )
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)